<item index="5" class="java.lang.String" itemvalue="io.reactivex.annotations.NonNull" />
          <item index="6" class="java.lang.String" itemvalue="io.reactivex.rxjava3.annotations.NonNull" />
          <item index="7" class="java.lang.String" itemvalue="jakarta.annotation.Nonnull" />
          <item index="8" class="java.lang.String" itemvalue="javax.annotation.Nonnull" />

      Map<Class<? extends @NonNull B>, B> backingMap) {
    return new MutableClassToInstanceMap<>(backingMap);
  }

  private final Map<Class<? extends @NonNull B>, B> delegate;

  private MutableClassToInstanceMap(Map<Class<? extends @NonNull B>, B> delegate) {
    this.delegate = checkNotNull(delegate);
  }

  @Override
  protected Map<Class<? extends @NonNull B>, B> delegate() {
    return delegate;
  }

     */
    @Nonnull
    Optional<List<String>> goals();

    /**
     * Returns the target POM model version for upgrades.
     * Supported values include "4.0.0" and "4.1.0".
     *
     * @return an {@link Optional} containing the model version, or empty if not specified
     */
    @Nonnull
    Optional<String> modelVersion();

    /**

import java.io.Reader;
import java.net.URL;
import java.nio.file.Path;

import org.apache.maven.api.annotations.Experimental;
import org.apache.maven.api.annotations.Immutable;
import org.apache.maven.api.annotations.Nonnull;
import org.apache.maven.api.annotations.NotThreadSafe;
import org.apache.maven.api.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * An XML reader request.
 *
 * @since 4.0.0
 */
@Experimental
@Immutable

   * (And even if annotations on local variables were permitted as an optional hint, no annotation
   * would be the right tool for the job here: {@code @Nullable} is the annotation that we're trying
   * to get rid of, and {@code @NonNull} would be wrong for our use case for the same reason as
   * {@code requireNonNull}: Our use case is the one in which {@code T} has parametric nullness—and
   * thus its value may be legitimately {@code null}.)
   */

   * (And even if annotations on local variables were permitted as an optional hint, no annotation
   * would be the right tool for the job here: {@code @Nullable} is the annotation that we're trying
   * to get rid of, and {@code @NonNull} would be wrong for our use case for the same reason as
   * {@code requireNonNull}: Our use case is the one in which {@code T} has parametric nullness—and
   * thus its value may be legitimately {@code null}.)
   */

      }
    };
  }

  @Override
  Spliterator<Cell<R, C, @Nullable V>> cellSpliterator() {
    return CollectSpliterators.<Cell<R, C, @Nullable V>>indexed(
        size(), Spliterator.ORDERED | Spliterator.NONNULL | Spliterator.DISTINCT, this::getCell);
  }

  private Cell<R, C, @Nullable V> getCell(int index) {
    return new Tables.AbstractCell<R, C, @Nullable V>() {
      final int rowIndex = index / columnList.size();

      @Override
      public void onOpen(@NotNull EventSource eventSource, @NotNull Response response) {
        try {
          assertEquals("text/event-stream", response.request().header("Accept"));
        } catch (Exception e) {
          future.completeExceptionally(e);
        }
      }

      @Override

        MultiValidationBean bean = new MultiValidationBean();
        bean.setRequiredCron(null); // Violates NotNull

        Set<ConstraintViolation<MultiValidationBean>> violations = validator.validate(bean);
        assertEquals(1, violations.size()); // Only NotNull violation

        bean.setRequiredCron("invalid"); // Now violates CronExpression
        violations = validator.validate(bean);

		AutoIncrement:          utils.CheckTruth(tagSetting["AUTOINCREMENT"]),
		HasDefaultValue:        utils.CheckTruth(tagSetting["AUTOINCREMENT"]),
		NotNull:                utils.CheckTruth(tagSetting["NOT NULL"], tagSetting["NOTNULL"]),
		Unique:                 utils.CheckTruth(tagSetting["UNIQUE"]),
		Comment:                tagSetting["COMMENT"],
		AutoIncrementIncrement: DefaultAutoIncrementIncrement,
	}