- name: 'Check out repository'
        uses: actions/checkout@de0fac2e4500dabe0009e67214ff5f5447ce83dd # v6.0.2
      # When we specify multiple JDKs, the final one becomes the default, which is used to execute Maven itself.
      # Our Maven configuration then specifies different JDKs to use for some of the steps:

Available JDKs on your machine are automatically detected and wired for the various compile and test tasks.
Some tests require multiple JDKs to be installed on your computer, be aware of this if you make changes related to anything toolchains related.

   * of Java 20, it always throws an exception, and as of Java 26, the method does not even exist.
   * For now, we continue using it to clean up under older JDKs.
   *
   * Our usages should at least be *relatively* safe: Typically, threads started by a test are dying
   * at the end of the test, so there is no object state put at risk by stopping the threads

   * of Java 20, it always throws an exception, and as of Java 26, the method does not even exist.
   * For now, we continue using it to clean up under older JDKs.
   *
   * Our usages should at least be *relatively* safe: Typically, threads started by a test are dying
   * at the end of the test, so there is no object state put at risk by stopping the threads

         * aren't stripping UnsafeComparator today? Should we have Proguard configuration for it?)
         *
         * - if Unsafe is removed entirely from JDKs (or already absent in some unusual environment
         * today). TODO: b/392974826 - Check for the existence of Unsafe and its methods
         * reflectively before attempting to access UnsafeComparator. Or, better yet, allow

    // We can continue if it's 1.8, and we can continue if it's an integer in [9, 20).
    if (javaVersion != null && javaVersion >= 20) {
      // TODO(b/261217224, b/361604053): Make this test work under newer JDKs.
      return;
    }
    TimedWaiterThread thread = new TimedWaiterThread(new AbstractFuture<Object>() {}, 2, SECONDS);
    thread.start();
    thread.awaitWaiting();

    // We can continue if it's 1.8, and we can continue if it's an integer in [9, 20).
    if (javaVersion != null && javaVersion >= 20) {
      // TODO(b/261217224, b/361604053): Make this test work under newer JDKs.
      return;
    }
    TimedWaiterThread thread = new TimedWaiterThread(new AbstractFuture<Object>() {}, 2, SECONDS);
    thread.start();
    thread.awaitWaiting();

    if (expectedSize < 3) {
      checkNonnegative(expectedSize, "expectedSize");
      return expectedSize + 1;
    }
    if (expectedSize < Ints.MAX_POWER_OF_TWO) {
      // This seems to be consistent across JDKs. The capacity argument to HashMap and LinkedHashMap
      // ends up being used to compute a "threshold" size, beyond which the internal table
      // will be resized. That threshold is ceilingPowerOfTwo(capacity*loadFactor), where

    if (expectedSize < 3) {
      checkNonnegative(expectedSize, "expectedSize");
      return expectedSize + 1;
    }
    if (expectedSize < Ints.MAX_POWER_OF_TWO) {
      // This seems to be consistent across JDKs. The capacity argument to HashMap and LinkedHashMap
      // ends up being used to compute a "threshold" size, beyond which the internal table
      // will be resized. That threshold is ceilingPowerOfTwo(capacity*loadFactor), where