assertTrue(urlQueue.getUrl() + "=>" + url2, urlQueue.getUrl().startsWith(url2));
            }

            dataService.iterate(sessionId1, accessResult -> assertTrue(accessResult.getUrl().startsWith(url1)));
            dataService.iterate(sessionId2, accessResult -> assertTrue(accessResult.getUrl().startsWith(url2)));

            dataService.delete(sessionId1);
            dataService.delete(sessionId2);

            final Number value = (Number) field;
            return (T) Long.valueOf(value.longValue());
        }
        return (T) field;
    }

    @Override
    public void iterate(final String sessionId, final AccessResultCallback<OpenSearchAccessResult> callback) {
        SearchResponse response = getClient().get(c -> c.prepareSearch(index).setScroll(new TimeValue(scrollTimeout))

    } catch (UnsupportedOperationException expected) {
    }
  }

  /**
   * Verifies that an Iterator is unmodifiable.
   *
   * <p>This test only works with iterators that iterate over a finite set.
   */
  public static void assertIteratorIsUnmodifiable(Iterator<?> iterator) {
    while (iterator.hasNext()) {
      iterator.next();
      try {
        iterator.remove();

    } catch (UnsupportedOperationException expected) {
    }
  }

  /**
   * Verifies that an Iterator is unmodifiable.
   *
   * <p>This test only works with iterators that iterate over a finite set.
   */
  public static void assertIteratorIsUnmodifiable(Iterator<?> iterator) {
    while (iterator.hasNext()) {
      iterator.next();
      try {
        iterator.remove();

  }

  /*
   * TODO: if we're testing a list, we could check indexOf(). (Doing it in
   * AbstractListTester isn't enough because many tests that run on lists don't
   * extends AbstractListTester.) We could also iterate over all elements to
   * verify absence
   */
  protected void expectMissing(E... elements) {
    for (E element : elements) {
      assertFalse("Should not contain " + element, actualContents().contains(element));

                }
            }
        }
        return ret;
    }

    @Override
    public void generateUrlQueues(final String previousSessionId, final String sessionId) {
        dataService.iterate(previousSessionId, accessResult -> {
            final OpenSearchUrlQueue urlQueue = new OpenSearchUrlQueue();
            urlQueue.setSessionId(sessionId);
            urlQueue.setMethod(accessResult.getMethod());

   * convenient.
   *
   * <p>By default, a {@code Builder} will generate bimaps that iterate over entries in the order
   * they were inserted into the builder. For example, in the above example, {@code
   * WORD_TO_INT.entrySet()} is guaranteed to iterate over the entries in the order {@code "one"=1,
   * "two"=2, "three"=3}, and {@code keySet()} and {@code values()} respect the same order. If you

   * convenient.
   *
   * <p>By default, a {@code Builder} will generate maps that iterate over entries in the order they
   * were inserted into the builder, equivalently to {@code LinkedHashMap}. For example, in the
   * above example, {@code WORD_TO_INT.entrySet()} is guaranteed to iterate over the entries in the
   * order {@code "one"=1, "two"=2, "three"=3}, and {@code keySet()} and {@code values()} respect

   * convenient.
   *
   * <p>By default, a {@code Builder} will generate maps that iterate over entries in the order they
   * were inserted into the builder, equivalently to {@code LinkedHashMap}. For example, in the
   * above example, {@code WORD_TO_INT.entrySet()} is guaranteed to iterate over the entries in the
   * order {@code "one"=1, "two"=2, "three"=3}, and {@code keySet()} and {@code values()} respect

        fireEvent(ResolutionListener.TEST_ARTIFACT, listeners, node);

        Object key = node.getKey();

        // TODO Does this check need to happen here? Had to add the same call
        // below when we iterate on child nodes -- will that suffice?
        if (managedVersions.containsKey(key)) {
            manageArtifact(node, managedVersions, listeners);
        }