import org.opensearch.action.admin.indices.alias.IndicesAliasesRequestBuilder;
import org.opensearch.action.admin.indices.create.CreateIndexResponse;
import org.opensearch.action.admin.indices.exists.indices.IndicesExistsResponse;
import org.opensearch.action.admin.indices.flush.FlushResponse;
import org.opensearch.action.admin.indices.get.GetIndexResponse;
import org.opensearch.action.admin.indices.mapping.get.GetMappingsResponse;

            assertEquals(0, response.writeParameterWordsWireFormat(null, 0));
        }

        @ParameterizedTest
        @ValueSource(ints = { 0, 5, 9 })
        @DisplayName("Returns 0 with valid array and various indices")
        void nonNullArray(int index) {
            byte[] arr = new byte[10];
            assertEquals(0, response.writeParameterWordsWireFormat(arr, index));
        }
    }

    @Nested

 * The implementation contains only trivial methods that return {@code 0}
 * or construct a string representation.  The tests focus on:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>happy‑path behaviour</li>
 *   <li>boundary arguments (e.g., negative indices, large values)</li>
 *   <li>string representation containing the class name</li>
 *   <li>null buffer handling</li>
 * </ul>
 */
final class TransWaitNamedPipeResponseTest {

    /**

    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Methods should handle negative indices")
    void testMethodsWithNegativeIndices() {
        // Arrange
        byte[] buffer = new byte[100];
        int negativeIndex = -1;

        // Act & Assert
        // These methods don't validate indices, so they return 0
        assertEquals(0, response.writeSetupWireFormat(buffer, negativeIndex));

            assertEquals(0, smbComTreeDisconnect.readBytesWireFormat(buffer, i));
        }
    }

    /**
     * Test boundary conditions for buffer indices
     */
    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test boundary conditions for buffer indices")
    public void testBoundaryConditions() {
        // Given
        smbComTreeDisconnect = new SmbComTreeDisconnect(config);
        byte[] buffer = new byte[100];

import jcifs.util.ByteEncodable;

@DisplayName("Encodable contract tests using ByteEncodable")
class EncodableTest {

    // Generates a few representative slices and destination indices.
    static Stream<Arguments> byteEncodableArgs() {
        return Stream.of(
                // srcLen, off, len, dstIndex
                Arguments.of(makeSeq(8), 0, 8, 0), // full copy at index 0

 * implementations, except when the table is sparse.
 *
 * <p>Null row keys or column keys are not permitted.
 *
 * <p>This class provides methods involving the underlying array structure, where the array indices
 * correspond to the position of a row or column in the lists of allowed keys and values. See the
 * {@link #at}, {@link #set}, {@link #toArray}, {@link #rowKeyList}, and {@link #columnKeyList}
 * methods for more details.
 *

	if len(indices) == 0 {
		return errInvalidArgument
	}

	if z.SinglePool() {
		return errInvalidArgument
	}

	// Make pool unwritable before decommissioning.
	if err := z.StartDecommission(ctx, indices...); err != nil {
		return err
	}

	go func() {
		for _, idx := range indices {

    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test writeBytesWireFormat with various buffer configurations")
    void testWriteBytesWireFormatVariousConfigurations() {
        // Test with different buffer sizes and indices
        int[][] configs = { { 100, 0 }, { 1024, 50 }, { 4096, 2000 }, { 65536, 32768 } };

        for (int[] config : configs) {
            byte[] dst = new byte[config[0]];
            int dstIndex = config[1];

	// The start index is inclusive and the end index is exclusive.
	type span struct {
		start int
		end   int
	}
	spans := make([]span, 0, 32)

	// Find the field start and end indices.
	// Doing this in a separate pass (rather than slicing the string s
	// and collecting the result substrings right away) is significantly
	// more efficient, possibly due to cache effects.