}
        return toReturn;
      }

      @GuardedBy("lock")
      /*
       * The GuardedBy checker warns us that we're not holding cancellationDelegate.lock. But in
       * fact we are holding it because it is the same as this.lock, which we know we are holding,
       * thanks to @GuardedBy above. (cancellationDelegate.lock is initialized to this.lock in the
       * call to `new SupplantableFuture` below.)
       */

        }
        return toReturn;
      }

      @GuardedBy("lock")
      /*
       * The GuardedBy checker warns us that we're not holding cancellationDelegate.lock. But in
       * fact we are holding it because it is the same as this.lock, which we know we are holding,
       * thanks to @GuardedBy above. (cancellationDelegate.lock is initialized to this.lock in the
       * call to `new SupplantableFuture` below.)
       */

        "value (%s) is outside the range for an unsigned integer value",
        value);
    return fromIntBits(value.intValue());
  }

  /**
   * Returns an {@code UnsignedInteger} holding the value of the specified {@code String}, parsed as
   * an unsigned {@code int} value.
   *
   * @throws NumberFormatException if the string does not contain a parsable unsigned {@code int}
   *     value
   */

  /**
   * Interrupts the running task. Because this internally calls {@link Thread#interrupt()} which can
   * in turn invoke arbitrary code it is not safe to call while holding a lock.
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("Interruption") // We are implementing a user-requested interrupt.
  final void interruptTask() {

 * itself is reclaimable. <i>Weak</i> means that locks/semaphores are created lazily, and they are
 * allowed to be reclaimed if nobody is holding on to them. This is useful, for example, if one
 * wants to create a {@code Striped<Lock>} of many locks, but worries that in most cases only a
 * small portion of these would be in use.
 *

    computingLatch.countDown();
    // don't check cache.size() until we know the get("b") call is complete
    computationComplete.await();

    // At this point, the listener should be holding the seed value (a -> a), and the map should
    // contain the computed value (b -> b), since the clear() happened before the computation
    // completed.
    assertEquals(1, listener.size());

    computingLatch.countDown();
    // don't check cache.size() until we know the get("b") call is complete
    computationComplete.await();

    // At this point, the listener should be holding the seed value (a -> a), and the map should
    // contain the computed value (b -> b), since the clear() happened before the computation
    // completed.
    assertEquals(1, listener.size());

    public V getValue() {
      updateIndex();
      /*
       * If the entry has been removed from the map, we return null, even though that might not be a
       * valid value. That's the best we can do, short of holding a reference to the most recently
       * seen value. And while we *could* do that, we aren't required to: Map.Entry explicitly says
       * that behavior is undefined when the backing map is modified through another API. (It even

      }
      updateLastKnownIndex();
      /*
       * If the entry has been removed from the map, we return null, even though that might not be a
       * valid value. That's the best we can do, short of holding a reference to the most recently
       * seen value. And while we *could* do that, we aren't required to: Map.Entry explicitly says
       * that behavior is undefined when the backing map is modified through another API. (It even