Thread.interrupted();
            if (interruptingThread.isAlive()) {
              // This will be hidden by test-output redirection:
              logger.severe("InterruptenatorTask did not exit; future tests may be affected");
              /*
               * This won't do any good under JUnit 3, but I'll leave it around in
               * case we ever switch to JUnit 4:
               */

            Thread.interrupted();
            if (interruptingThread.isAlive()) {
              // This will be hidden by test-output redirection:
              logger.severe("InterruptenatorTask did not exit; future tests may be affected");
              /*
               * This won't do any good under JUnit 3, but I'll leave it around in
               * case we ever switch to JUnit 4:
               */

   *
   * @param reference any array of the desired type
   * @param length the length of the new array
   */
  /*
   * The new array contains nulls, even if the old array did not. If we wanted to be accurate, we
   * would declare a return type of `@Nullable T[]`. However, we've decided not to think too hard
   * about arrays for now, as they're a mess. (We previously discussed this in the review of

   *
   * @param reference any array of the desired type
   * @param length the length of the new array
   */
  /*
   * The new array contains nulls, even if the old array did not. If we wanted to be accurate, we
   * would declare a return type of `@Nullable T[]`. However, we've decided not to think too hard
   * about arrays for now, as they're a mess. (We previously discussed this in the review of

       * This read is guaranteed to get us the right value because we only set this once (here).
       *
       * requireNonNull is safe because either our compareAndSet succeeded or it failed because
       * another thread did it for us.
       */
      seenExceptionsLocal = requireNonNull(seenExceptionsField);
    }
    return seenExceptionsLocal;
  }

         * predictable what work might be done. (e.g., close a file and flush buffers to disk). To
         * protect ourselves from this, we park ourselves and tell our interrupter that we did so.
         */
        if (state == PARKED || compareAndSet(state, PARKED)) {
          // Interrupting Cow Says:
          //  ______
          // < Park >
          //  ------
          //        \   ^__^

    assertEquals("2", iterator.next());
    assertEquals("3", iterator.next());
    assertEquals("4", iterator.next());
    assertEquals(4, iterator.nextIndex());
    try {
      iterator.next();
      fail("did not detect end of list");
    } catch (NoSuchElementException expected) {
    }
    assertEquals(3, iterator.previousIndex());
    assertEquals("4", iterator.previous());
    assertEquals("3", iterator.previous());

      Object candidateKey = entry.getKey();

      /*
       * Assume that equals uses the == optimization when appropriate, and that
       * it would check hash codes as an optimization when appropriate. If we
       * did these things, it would just make things worse for the most
       * performance-conscious users.
       */
      if (key.equals(candidateKey)) {
        return entry.getValue();
      }
    }
    return null;

    // problem on any failure.

    // Yeah it's n^2.
    for (Object object : exp) {
      if (!act.remove(object)) {
        fail(
            "did not contain expected element "
                + object
                + ", "
                + "expected = "
                + exp
                + ", actual = "
                + actString);
      }

   * (preferring constructors with at least one {@code String}, then preferring constructors with at
   * least one {@code Throwable}) and calling the constructor via reflection. If the exception did
   * not already have a cause, one is set by calling {@link Throwable#initCause(Throwable)} on it.
   * If no such constructor exists, an {@code IllegalArgumentException} is thrown.
   *