public static final String SLACK_WEBHOOK_URLS_PROPERTY = "slack.webhook.urls";

    /** Property key for Google Chat webhook URLs configuration. */
    public static final String GOOGLE_CHAT_WEBHOOK_URLS_PROPERTY = "google.chat.webhook.urls";

    /** Property key for browser locale usage in search configuration. */

        .that(Ints.tryParse(Long.toString(((long) LEAST) * 10)))
        .isNull();
    assertWithMessage("Max long").that(Ints.tryParse(Long.toString(Long.MAX_VALUE))).isNull();
    assertWithMessage("Min long").that(Ints.tryParse(Long.toString(Long.MIN_VALUE))).isNull();
    assertThat(Ints.tryParse("\u0662\u06f3")).isNull();
  }

  /**
   * Applies {@link Ints#tryParse(String)} to the given string and asserts that the result is as

  }

  /*
   * Whenever an implementation uses `instanceof` on a parameter instance, the test has to know that
   * (so much for "black box") and try instances that both do and don't pass the check. The "don't"
   * half of that is more awkward to arrange...
   */
  private static <T> Iterable<T> iterable(Collection<T> collection) {
    // return collection::iterator;

start by opening a new issue describing the bug or feature you're intending to
fix. Even if you think it's relatively minor, it's helpful to know what people
are working on. And as mentioned above, API changes should be discussed
thoroughly before moving to code.

Some examples of types of pull requests that are immediately helpful:

  - Fixing a bug without changing a public API.
  - Fixing or improving documentation.

 *  Upgrade: [Okio 3.16.2][okio_3_16_2].
 *  Upgrade: [ZSTD-KMP 0.4.0][zstd_kmp_0_4_0]. This update fixes a bug that caused APKs to fail
    [16 KB ELF alignment checks][elf_alignment].


## Version 5.2.3

_2025-11-18_

 *  Fix: Don't delay triggering timeouts. In Okio 3.16.0 we introduced a regression that caused
    timeouts to fire later than they were supposed to.

 *  Upgrade: [Okio 3.16.4][okio_3_16_4].

    }
  }

  // We need to test that our method behaves like the JDK method.
  @SuppressWarnings("InlineMeInliner")
  public void testCompare() {
    for (double x : VALUES) {
      for (double y : VALUES) {
        // note: spec requires only that the sign is the same
        assertWithMessage("%s, %s", x, y)
            .that(Doubles.compare(x, y))
            .isEqualTo(Double.compare(x, y));

    tests themselves and not the code being tested that needs that access, though there's no
    obvious way to ensure that.

    We could consider arranging things so that only the tests we know need this would get
    the add-opens. Right now that doesn't seem worth the effort, though.
    -->
    <test.add.opens>
      --add-opens java.base/java.lang=ALL-UNNAMED

    tests themselves and not the code being tested that needs that access, though there's no
    obvious way to ensure that.

    We could consider arranging things so that only the tests we know need this would get
    the add-opens. Right now that doesn't seem worth the effort, though.
    -->
    <test.add.opens>
      --add-opens java.base/java.lang=ALL-UNNAMED

          .that(ex.getMessage().contains(String.valueOf(value)))
          .isTrue();
    }
  }

  // We need to test that our method behaves like the JDK method.
  @SuppressWarnings("InlineMeInliner")
  public void testCompare() {
    for (char x : VALUES) {
      for (char y : VALUES) {
        assertWithMessage("%s, %s", x, y)
            .that(Math.signum(Chars.compare(x, y)))

  }

  /**
   * Generates test cases for the given combination of scenario and timeouts. For methods that take
   * an explicit timeout value, all of the given timeoutsToUse result in individual test cases. For
   * methods that do not take an explicit timeout value, a single test case is generated only if the
   * implicit timeout of that method matches the given timeoutsToUse. For example, enter() is