Subject second = auth.getSubject();
        if (first == null && second == null) {
            // Both null - caching is working
            assertNull(second, "Second getSubject should return same result as first (both null)");
        } else if (first != null && second != null) {
            // Both non-null - should be same instance

}

func (r *testOneByteReadNoEOF) Read(p []byte) (n int, err error) {
	if r.eof {
		return 0, io.EOF
	}
	n = copy(p, r.data)
	r.eof = true
	return n, nil
}

// Wrapper for calling testMakeBucket for both Erasure and FS.
func TestMakeBucket(t *testing.T) {
	ExecObjectLayerTest(t, testMakeBucket)
}

// Tests validate bucket creation.
func testMakeBucket(obj ObjectLayer, instanceType string, t TestErrHandler) {

    public void testConstructorWithMessageAndCause() {
        // Create exception with both message and cause
        String message = "Transport error occurred";
        IllegalStateException rootCause = new IllegalStateException("State error");
        TransportException exception = new TransportException(message, rootCause);

        // Verify both message and cause are set correctly

        assertEquals(message, exception.getMessage());
        assertNull(exception.getCause());
    }

    public void test_constructor_withNullMessageAndCause() {
        // Test constructor with both null message and cause
        FessSystemException exception = new FessSystemException(null, null);

        assertNull(exception.getMessage());
        assertNull(exception.getCause());
    }

    }

    /**
     * Test the constructor with both a message and a cause.
     */
    @Test
    void testMessageAndCauseConstructor() {
        String errorMessage = "This is a test error message.";
        Throwable cause = new RuntimeException("Root cause");
        PACDecodingException e = new PACDecodingException(errorMessage, cause);
        // Expect both the message and the cause to be set correctly

- i.e with `mc stat --version-id dm-version-id`

It must be noted that if active-active replication is set up with delete marker replication, there is potential for duplicate delete markers to be created if both source and target concurrently set a Delete Marker or if one/both of the clusters went down at tandem before the replication event was synced.This is an unavoidable side-effect in active-active replication caused by allowing delete markers set on a object version with `REPLICA` status...

     * deal with the cases where rounding towards 0 is wrong, which typically depends on the sign of
     * p / q.
     *
     * signum is 1 if p and q are both nonnegative or both negative, and -1 otherwise.
     */
    int signum = 1 | (int) ((p ^ q) >> (Long.SIZE - 1));
    boolean increment;
    switch (mode) {
      case UNNECESSARY:
        checkRoundingUnnecessary(rem == 0);

        assertEquals(message, exception.getMessage());
        assertNull(exception.getCause());
    }

    public void test_constructor_withNullMessageAndCause() {
        // Test constructor with both null message and cause
        SsoProcessException exception = new SsoProcessException(null, null);

        assertNull(exception.getMessage());
        assertNull(exception.getCause());
    }

    /**
     * File information class for both names directory information.
     */
    public static final byte FILE_BOTH_DIRECTORY_INFO = 0x03;

    /**
     * File information class for file names only.
     */
    public static final byte FILE_NAMES_INFO = 0x0C;

    /**
     * File information class for both names with file IDs.
     */

```Python
if "stanleyjobsox" == "stanleyjobson" and "love123" == "swordfish":
    ...
```

Python will have to compare the whole `stanleyjobso` in both `stanleyjobsox` and `stanleyjobson` before realizing that both strings are not the same. So it will take some extra microseconds to reply back "Incorrect username or password".

#### The time to answer helps the attackers { #the-time-to-answer-helps-the-attackers }