The hypothetical commands `show w' and `show c' should show the
appropriate parts of the General Public License. Of course, the commands
you use may be called something other than `show w' and `show c'; they
could even be mouse-clicks or menu items--whatever suits your program.

You should also get your employer (if you work as a programmer) or your
school, if any, to sign a "copyright disclaimer" for the program, if

<!DOCTYPE suppressions PUBLIC
        "-//Checkstyle//DTD SuppressionFilter Configuration 1.0//EN"
        "https://checkstyle.org/dtds/suppressions_1_0.dtd">

<suppressions>
    <suppress checks="JavadocVariable|JavadocMethod" files=".*" />
    <suppress checks="HiddenField" files=".*" />

     * Retrieves the current Maven version, for example "3.0.2".
     *
     * @return The current Maven version or an empty string if unknown, never {@code null}.
     */
    String getMavenVersion();

    /**
     * Checks whether the current Maven runtime matches the specified version range. A version range can either use the
     * usual mathematical syntax "[2.0.10,2.1.0),[3.0,)" or use a single version "2.2.1". The latter is a short form for

     * @throws VersionParserException if the range specification violates the syntax rules of this scheme
     */
    @Nonnull
    VersionConstraint parseVersionConstraint(@Nonnull String constraint);

    /**
     * Checks whether a given artifact version is considered a {@code SNAPSHOT} or not.
     */
    boolean isSnapshot(@Nonnull String version);

    /**
     * The collection of "G:A" combinations that do NOT belong to Maven Core, hence, should be excluded from
     * "expected in provided scope" type of checks.
     */
    static final Collection<String> EXPECTED_PROVIDED_SCOPE_EXCLUSIONS_GA =
            Collections.unmodifiableCollection(Arrays.asList(

     */
    @Nonnull
    Path getPathForRemoteArtifact(@Nonnull RemoteRepository remote, @Nonnull Artifact artifact);

    /**
     * Checks whether a given artifact version is considered a {@code SNAPSHOT} or not.
     * <p>
     * Shortcut for {@code getService(ArtifactManager.class).isSnapshot(...)}.
     * <p>

        }

        //
        // TODO jvz Why isn't all this checking the job of the duty of the workspace resolver, we know that we
        // have a model that is suitable, yet more checks are done here and the one for the version is problematic
        // before because with parents as ranges it will never work in this scenario.
        //

        String groupId = getGroupId(candidateModel);

import org.apache.maven.api.model.Model;
import org.apache.maven.api.services.ModelBuilderRequest;
import org.apache.maven.api.services.ModelProblemCollector;

/**
 * Checks the model for missing or invalid values.
 *
 */
public interface ModelValidator {
    /**
     * Checks the specified file model for missing or invalid values. This model is directly created from the POM

                    return mirror;
                }
            }
        }

        return null;
    }

    /**
     * This method checks if the pattern matches the originalRepository. Valid patterns:
     * <ul>
     * <li>{@code *} = everything,</li>
     * <li>{@code external:*} = everything not on the localhost and not file based,</li>

 - [ ] Write a pull request description that is detailed enough to understand what the pull request does, how, and why.
 - [ ] Run `mvn clean verify` to make sure basic checks pass. A more thorough check will
       be performed on your pull request automatically.
 - [ ] You have run the [Core IT][core-its] successfully.

If your pull request is about ~20 lines of code you don't need to sign an