}
        }

        /*
         * MNG-4312: We neither have reserved all of the above magic expressions nor is their set fixed/well-known (it
         * gets occasionally extended by newer Maven versions). This imposes the risk for existing plugins to
         * unintentionally use such a magic expression for an ordinary property. So here we check whether we

        String goal = null;

        Plugin plugin = null;

        String[] tok = task.split(":");

        int numTokens = tok.length;

        if (numTokens >= 4) {
            // We have everything that we need
            //
            // org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.0:process
            //
            // groupId
            // artifactId
            // version

    }

    /**
     * Setup exactly the same as the above test, except that the child project
     * now depends upon d, which has a transitive dependency on c.  Even though
     * we did list an exclusion on c, it was only from within the context of
     * project b.  We will pick up project c in this case because no
     * restrictions were placed on d.  This demonstrates that a, b, c, & d will
     * all be collected.
     *

        // default SettingsXmlConfigurationProcessor.
        //
        int userSuppliedConfigurationProcessorCount = configurationProcessors.size() - 1;

        if (userSuppliedConfigurationProcessorCount == 0) {
            //
            // Our settings.xml source is historically how we have configured Maven from the CLI so we are going to

      <groupId>org.codehaus.plexus</groupId>
      <artifactId>plexus-xml</artifactId>
      <version>${plexusXmlVersion}</version>
      <scope>provided</scope>
      <exclusions>
        <!-- we need the exclusion to be able to release, else we have a cycle -->
        <exclusion>
          <groupId>org.apache.maven</groupId>
          <artifactId>maven-xml-impl</artifactId>
        </exclusion>
      </exclusions>
    </dependency>

                    }
                    cycle.removeLast();
                    stateMap.put(v, DfsState.VISITED);
                } else if (state == DfsState.VISITING) {
                    // we are already visiting this vertex, this mean we have a cycle
                    int pos = cycle.lastIndexOf(v);
                    List<String> ret = cycle.subList(pos, cycle.size());
                    ret.add(v);
                    return ret;

import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;

import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertEquals;

/**
 * A test which demonstrates maven's recursive inheritance where
 * we are testing to make sure that elements stated in a model are
 * not clobbered by the same elements elsewhere in the lineage.
 *
 */
@Deprecated
class ProjectInheritanceTest extends AbstractProjectInheritanceTestCase {

    // <plugin/> block in a Maven POM. We have to do some wiggling to pull the sources of information
    // together and this really shows the problem of constructing a sensible default configuration but
    // it's all encapsulated here so it appears normalized to the POM builder.

    // We are going to take the project packaging and find all plugins in the default lifecycle and create

    currently wrong for execution.

    <<NOTE:>> Do we want to fail when we cannot bind a mojo to the lifecycle
    because of offline/online status? That would probably indicate that the user
    was trying to do something they cannot succeed at for now...so we probably

                            return new PluginInfo(groupId, artifactId, goalPrefix, name);
                        }
                    }
                } catch (Exception e) {
                    // here we can have: IO. ZIP or Plexus Conf Ex: but we should not interfere with user intent
                }
            }
        }
        return null;
    }