/**
     * OS family that can be tested for. {@value}
     */
    private static final String FAMILY_OS400 = "os/400";

    /**
     * OpenJDK is reported to call MacOS X "Darwin"
     *
     * @see <a href="https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44889">bugzilla issue</a>
     * @see <a href="https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3318">HADOOP-3318</a>
     */

    if: github.event_name == 'push' || ( github.event_name == 'pull_request' && github.event.pull_request.head.repo.fork )

    strategy:
      matrix:
        os: [ubuntu-latest, windows-latest, macOS-latest]
      fail-fast: false

    runs-on: ${{ matrix.os }}

    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
        with:
          persist-credentials: false

      - uses: actions/setup-java@v4

 * lifecycle at all, in which case we wouldn't be needing this class at all ( and
 * ProjectBuildList.getByTaskSegments). Or maybe they should be introduced in the calculation
 * of the execution plan instead, which seems much nicer.
 * </p>
 * <p>
 * Additionally this class contains a clone of the MavenSession, which is *only* needed
 * because it has as notion of a "current" project.
 * </p>

  All of these operations will produce their own unique errors in the absence of
  a coordinated offline strategy. In addition, efforts to unite these failing
  behaviors behind a consistent user interface is much, much more difficult if
  the system can't tell whether it has access to the network required by these
  operations.

  Offline mode really means anticipating a lack of network connectivity, and as

        // snapshot timestamp, or some other timestamp later encoded into the metadata.
        // TODO this needs to be repeated here so the merging doesn't interfere with the written metadata
        //  - we'd be much better having a pristine input, and an ongoing metadata for merging instead

        Map<ArtifactRepository, Metadata> previousMetadata = new HashMap<>();
        ArtifactRepository selected = null;

h3. Plugins need a specific metadata model

Each application will have its own model for plugins. Much of this model will be common across applications but there will always be issues specific to a particular applications’s plugins. Some of the issues that need to be taken into consideration:

* Plugin dependencies