candidateSource = ModelSource.fromPath(candidateModel.getPomFile());
        }

        //
        // TODO jvz Why isn't all this checking the job of the duty of the workspace resolver, we know that we
        // have a model that is suitable, yet more checks are done here and the one for the version is problematic
        // before because with parents as ranges it will never work in this scenario.
        //

            is then described by additional elements.
            Projects should only list the license(s) that applies to the project
            and not the licenses that apply to dependencies.
            If multiple licenses are listed, it is assumed that the user can select
            any of them, not that they must accept all.
            ]]>
          </description>
          <association>

import org.eclipse.aether.repository.WorkspaceRepository;
import org.eclipse.aether.util.artifact.ArtifactIdUtils;
import org.slf4j.Logger;
import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;

/**
 * An implementation of a workspace reader that knows how to search the Maven reactor for artifacts, either as packaged
 * jar if it has been built, or only compile output directory if packaging hasn't happened yet.
 *
 */
@Named(ReactorReader.HINT)
@SessionScoped

 * the final model of the project being assembled. There is no
 * overriding going on amongst the models being used in this test:
 * each model in the lineage is providing a value that is not present
 * anywhere else in the lineage. We are just making sure that values
 * down in the lineage are bubbling up where they should.
 *
 */
@Deprecated
class ProjectInheritanceTest extends AbstractProjectInheritanceTestCase {

     * @return remote repository that can be used to download or upload artifacts
     *
     * @see org.apache.maven.api.services.RepositoryFactory#createRemote(Repository)
     */
    @Nonnull
    RemoteRepository createRemoteRepository(@Nonnull Repository repository);

    /**
     * Creates a coordinate out of string that is formatted like:

        }

        // We are forcing the use of the plugin realm for all lookups that might occur during
        // the lifecycle that is part of the lookup. Here we are specifically trying to keep
        // lookups that occur in contextualize calls in line with the right realm.
        ClassRealm oldLookupRealm = container.setLookupRealm(pluginRealm);

Copyright (c) 2002-2024, the original author or authors.
All rights reserved.

https://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause

Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, are permitted provided that the following
conditions are met:

Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.

         * OverConstrainedVersionException e ) { assertTrue( e.getMessage().indexOf( "[1.0-SNAPSHOT]" ) <
         * e.getMessage().indexOf( "[1.0,)" ) ); }
         */
    }

    @Test
    @Disabled("that one does not work")
    void testOverConstrainedVersionException()
            throws ArtifactResolutionException, InvalidVersionSpecificationException {
        ArtifactSpec a = createArtifactSpec("a", "1.0");

            }
            if (null == obj || !getClass().equals(obj.getClass())) {
                return false;
            }
            GavCacheKey that = (GavCacheKey) obj;
            return Objects.equals(this.gav, that.gav) && Objects.equals(this.tag, that.tag);
        }

        @Override
        public int hashCode() {
            return hash;
        }

        @Override

    }

    /**
     * Tests that <code>a:2.0</code> wins in the scenario:
     * <pre>
     * a:1.0
     * a:2.0
     * </pre>
     */
    @Test
    void testEqual() {
        ResolutionNode a1n = createResolutionNode(a1);
        ResolutionNode a2n = createResolutionNode(a2);

        assertResolveConflict(a2n, a1n, a2n);
    }

    /**
     * Tests that <code>a:2.0</code> wins in the scenario: