if ((!features.contains(IteratorFeature.SUPPORTS_REMOVE) && removes > 1)
        || (stimuli.length >= 5 && removes > 2)) {
      // removes are the most expensive thing to test, since they often throw exceptions with stack
      // traces, so we test them a bit less aggressively
      return;
    }

   * might be null, or you need support for {@link List#set(int, Object)}, use {@link
   * Arrays#asList}.
   *
   * <p>Note that even when you do need the ability to add or remove, this method provides only a
   * tiny bit of syntactic sugar for {@code newArrayList(}{@link Arrays#asList asList}{@code
   * (...))}, or for creating an empty list then calling {@link Collections#addAll}. This method is

    assertThat(m.keySet()).containsExactly("boy", "girl", "cat", "dog").inOrder();
    assertThat(m)
        .isEqualTo(ImmutableMap.of("boy", "tom", "girl", "tina", "cat", "kitty", "dog", "tommy"));

    // try in a different order
    m = COMMA_SPLITTER.withKeyValueSeparator(":").split("girl:tina,boy:tom,dog:tommy,cat:kitty");

     * to avoid the extra class for the lambda (and maybe more for memoizingSupplier itself) and the
     * indirection.
     *
     * One thing to *avoid* is a change to make each Logger user use memoizingSupplier directly:
     * That may introduce an extra class for each lambda (currently a dozen).
     */
    Logger local = logger;
    if (local != null) {

     * parts other than the last may begin with a digit (for example, "3com.com"). It's important to
     * disallow an initial digit in the last part; it's the only thing that stops an IPv4 numeric
     * address like 127.0.0.1 from looking like a valid domain name.
     */

    if (isFinalPart && DIGIT_MATCHER.matches(part.charAt(0))) {
      return false;
    }

    assertThat(m.keySet()).containsExactly("boy", "girl", "cat", "dog").inOrder();
    assertThat(m)
        .isEqualTo(ImmutableMap.of("boy", "tom", "girl", "tina", "cat", "kitty", "dog", "tommy"));

    // try in a different order
    m = COMMA_SPLITTER.withKeyValueSeparator(":").split("girl:tina,boy:tom,dog:tommy,cat:kitty");

   * `new Integer` (as we do) instead of `Integer.valueOf`. However, under J2KT, `new Integer`
   * gets translated back to `Integer.valueOf` because that is the only thing J2KT can support. And
   * anyway, it's nice to avoid `Integer.valueOf` because the Android toolchain optimizes multiple
   * `Integer.valueOf` calls into one! So we stick with the deprecated `Integer` constructor.
   */

    }
    return offset;
  }

  @J2ktIncompatible // serialization
  @GwtIncompatible // serialization
  Object writeReplace() {
    // We serialize by default to ImmutableList, the simplest thing that works.
    return new ImmutableList.SerializedForm(toArray());
  }

  @J2ktIncompatible // serialization
  private void readObject(ObjectInputStream stream) throws InvalidObjectException {

    }
    return offset;
  }

  @J2ktIncompatible // serialization
  @GwtIncompatible // serialization
  Object writeReplace() {
    // We serialize by default to ImmutableList, the simplest thing that works.
    return new ImmutableList.SerializedForm(toArray());
  }

  @J2ktIncompatible // serialization
  private void readObject(ObjectInputStream stream) throws InvalidObjectException {

    checkNotNull(strategy);

    if (expectedInsertions == 0) {
      expectedInsertions = 1;
    }
    /*
     * TODO(user): Put a warning in the javadoc about tiny fpp values, since the resulting size
     * is proportional to -log(p), but there is not much of a point after all, e.g.
     * optimalM(1000, 0.0000000000000001) = 76680 which is less than 10kb. Who cares!
     */