* on the fields of TimeoutFuture. This field is slightly different from the fields discussed
   * there: cancel() never reads this field, only writes to it. That makes the race here completely
   * harmless, rather than just 99.99% harmless.
   */
  @CheckForNull @LazyInit private List<@Nullable Present<V>> values;

  CollectionFuture(
      ImmutableCollection<? extends ListenableFuture<? extends V>> futures,

  public ReentrantLock newReentrantLock(String lockName) {
    return newReentrantLock(lockName, false);
  }

  /**
   * Creates a {@link ReentrantLock} with the given fairness policy. The {@code lockName} is used in
   * the warning or exception output to help identify the locks involved in the detected deadlock.
   */
  public ReentrantLock newReentrantLock(String lockName, boolean fair) {

  private final AtomicReference<Throwable> threadFailure = new AtomicReference<>(null);

  /**
   * Records an exception so that it can be rethrown later in the test harness thread, triggering a
   * test case failure. Only the first failure is recorded; subsequent calls to this method from
   * within the same test have no effect.
   */
  public void threadRecordFailure(Throwable t) {

  private final AtomicReference<Throwable> threadFailure = new AtomicReference<>(null);

  /**
   * Records an exception so that it can be rethrown later in the test harness thread, triggering a
   * test case failure. Only the first failure is recorded; subsequent calls to this method from
   * within the same test have no effect.
   */
  public void threadRecordFailure(Throwable t) {

       *
       * This has the nice-ish side effect of limiting reentrancy: run() calls
       * timeoutFuture.setException() calls run(). That reentrancy would already be harmless, since
       * timeoutFuture can be set (and delegate cancelled) only once. (And "set only once" is
       * important for other reasons: run() can still be invoked concurrently in different threads,

    Ordering<Number> k = objects.compound(objects.compound(numbers));

    // You can also arbitrarily assign a more restricted type - not an intended
    // feature, exactly, but unavoidable (I think) and harmless
    Ordering<Integer> l = objects.compound(numbers);

    // This correctly doesn't work:
    // Ordering<Object> m = numbers.compound(objects);

    Ordering<Number> k = objects.compound(objects.compound(numbers));

    // You can also arbitrarily assign a more restricted type - not an intended
    // feature, exactly, but unavoidable (I think) and harmless
    Ordering<Integer> l = objects.compound(numbers);

    // This correctly doesn't work:
    // Ordering<Object> m = numbers.compound(objects);

/**
 * Unit test for {@link Ints}.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 */
@GwtCompatible(emulated = true)
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
@SuppressWarnings("cast") // redundant casts are intentional and harmless
public class IntsTest extends TestCase {
  private static final int[] EMPTY = {};
  private static final int[] ARRAY1 = {(int) 1};
  private static final int[] ARRAY234 = {(int) 2, (int) 3, (int) 4};

        <configuration>
          <excludes>
            <!-- Yes, we want to exclude ForceGuavaCompilation 4 times: -->
            <!-- (And we might as well exclude DummyJavadocClass 3 times (though it would be harmless to include).) -->
            <!-- 1. Don't compile it (since that requires a *non-test* dep on gwt-user. -->
            <exclude>**/ForceGuavaCompilation*</exclude>
            <exclude>**/DummyJavadocClass*</exclude>

/**
 * Unit test for {@link Ints}.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 */
@GwtCompatible(emulated = true)
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
@SuppressWarnings("cast") // redundant casts are intentional and harmless
public class IntsTest extends TestCase {
  private static final int[] EMPTY = {};
  private static final int[] ARRAY1 = {(int) 1};
  private static final int[] ARRAY234 = {(int) 2, (int) 3, (int) 4};