throw new SecurityException();
          }

          @Override
          public void checkPermission(Permission perm) {
            // Do nothing so we can clear the security manager at the end
          }
        });
    try {
      final String oldName = Thread.currentThread().getName();
      Supplier<String> newName = Suppliers.ofInstance("MyCrazyThreadName");

  /**
   * Runs Runnable r with a security policy that permits precisely the specified permissions. If
   * there is no current security manager, the runnable is run twice, both with and without a
   * security manager. We require that any security manager permit getPolicy/setPolicy.
   */
  public void runWithPermissions(Runnable r, Permission... permissions) {
    SecurityManager sm = System.getSecurityManager();

    return (timeoutNanos <= 0L) ? 0L : timeoutNanos - (System.nanoTime() - startTime);
  }

  /**
   * Signals some other thread waiting on a satisfied guard, if one exists.
   *
   * <p>We manage calls to this method carefully, to signal only when necessary, but never losing a
   * signal, which is the classic problem of this kind of concurrency construct. We must signal if

  /**
   * Runs Runnable r with a security policy that permits precisely the specified permissions. If
   * there is no current security manager, the runnable is run twice, both with and without a
   * security manager. We require that any security manager permit getPolicy/setPolicy.
   */
  public void runWithPermissions(Runnable r, Permission... permissions) {
    SecurityManager sm = System.getSecurityManager();

import java.util.concurrent.Executor;
import java.util.logging.Level;
import javax.annotation.CheckForNull;

/**
 * A support class for {@code ListenableFuture} implementations to manage their listeners. An
 * instance contains a list of listeners, each with an associated {@code Executor}, and guarantees
 * that every {@code Runnable} that is {@linkplain #add added} will be executed after {@link

         * invoke interruptTask on any subsequent futures.
         */
        callInterruptTask = false;
      }
      // We call this before the listeners in order to avoid needing to manage a separate stack data
      // structure for them.  Also, some implementations rely on this running prior to listeners
      // so that the cleanup work is visible to listeners.

      return false;
    }
  }

  /**
   * Creates a thread using {@link #platformThreadFactory}, and sets its name to {@code name} unless
   * changing the name is forbidden by the security manager.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // concurrency
  static Thread newThread(String name, Runnable runnable) {
    checkNotNull(name);
    checkNotNull(runnable);

 *
 * <pre>{@code
 * class Server {
 *   public static void main(String[] args) {
 *     Set<Service> services = ...;
 *     ServiceManager manager = new ServiceManager(services);
 *     manager.addListener(new Listener() {
 *         public void stopped() {}
 *         public void healthy() {
 *           // Services have been initialized and are healthy, start accepting requests...

        <!--
            In order to build and run the tests against JDK 18+, we need to pass java.security.manager=allow, to make
            the deprecated 'java.lang.SecurityManager' available for use.
         -->
        <jdk>[18,]</jdk>
      </activation>
      <properties>
        <test.add.args>-Djava.security.manager=allow</test.add.args>
      </properties>
    </profile>
  </profiles>

     * call, so we can't assume that writes to the Entry have been safely published by some other
     * synchronization actions.)
     *
     * All that said: I haven't actually managed to make this particular test produce a TSAN error
     * for the field accesses in MapIteratorCache. This test *has* found other TSAN errors,