description: If this issue is platform-specific, then please select the relevant platforms.
      multiple: true
      options:
        - Android
        - GWT
        - Java 8
        - Java 11
        - Java 17

  - type: checkboxes
    attributes:
      label: Checklist
      options:
        - label: >
            I agree to follow the

   *
   * <p>Why <i>not</i> just add {@code SuppressWarnings}? The problem is that this method is
   * typically useful for {@code return} statements. That leaves the code with two options: Either
   * add the suppression to the whole method (which turns off checking for a large section of code),
   * or extract a variable, and put the suppression on that. However, a local variable typically

    this.backingThreadFactory = checkNotNull(backingThreadFactory);
    return this;
  }

  /**
   * Returns a new thread factory using the options supplied during the building process. After
   * building, it is still possible to change the options used to build the ThreadFactory and/or
   * build again. State is not shared amongst built instances.
   *
   * @return the fully constructed {@link ThreadFactory}
   */

  private enum DirectoryDeleteMethod {
    DELETE_DIRECTORY_CONTENTS {
      @Override
      public void delete(Path path, RecursiveDeleteOption... options) throws IOException {
        MoreFiles.deleteDirectoryContents(path, options);
      }

      @Override
      public void assertDeleteSucceeded(Path path) throws IOException {
        assertEquals(

      description: Please provide use cases that actually came up in the real world.
    validations:
      required: true

  - type: checkboxes
    attributes:
      label: Checklist
      options:
        - label: >
            I agree to follow the
            [code of conduct](https://github.com/google/.github/blob/master/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md).
          required: true
        - label: >

   *
   * <p>Why <i>not</i> just add {@code SuppressWarnings}? The problem is that this method is
   * typically useful for {@code return} statements. That leaves the code with two options: Either
   * add the suppression to the whole method (which turns off checking for a large section of code),
   * or extract a variable, and put the suppression on that. However, a local variable typically

      required: true

  - type: dropdown
    attributes:
      label: Packages
      description: Please select all of the packages that are relevant to this feature request.
      multiple: true
      options:
        - com.google.common.annotations
        - com.google.common.base
        - com.google.common.cache
        - com.google.common.collect
        - com.google.common.escape
        - com.google.common.eventbus

   *
   * <p>Why <i>not</i> just add {@code SuppressWarnings}? The problem is that this method is
   * typically useful for {@code return} statements. That leaves the code with two options: Either
   * add the suppression to the whole method (which turns off checking for a large section of code),
   * or extract a variable, and put the suppression on that. However, a local variable typically

        getMultiset().setCount(e0(), 1, 5));
    expectContents(nCopies(3, e0()));
  }

  /*
   * TODO: test that unmodifiable multisets either throw UOE or return false
   * when both are valid options. Currently we test the UOE cases and the
   * return-false cases but not their intersection
   */

import java.util.Comparator;
import java.util.Map;
import javax.annotation.CheckForNull;

/**
 * Used to represent the order of elements in a data structure that supports different options for
 * iteration order guarantees.
 *
 * <p>Example usage:
 *
 * <pre>{@code
 * MutableGraph<Integer> graph =
 *     GraphBuilder.directed().nodeOrder(ElementOrder.<Integer>natural()).build();
 * }</pre>
 *