public void testNoNewApis() throws Exception {
    assertWithMessage(
            "Do not add new methods to ListenableFuture. Its API needs to continue to match the"
                + " version we released in a separate artifact com.google.guava:listenablefuture.")
        .that(ListenableFuture.class.getDeclaredMethods())
        .asList()
        .containsExactly(

# This workflow uses actions that are not certified by GitHub. They are provided
# by a third-party and are governed by separate terms of service, privacy
# policy, and support documentation.

name: Scorecard supply-chain security
on:
  # For Branch-Protection check. Only the default branch is supported. See
  # https://github.com/ossf/scorecard/blob/main/docs/checks.md#branch-protection
  branch_protection_rule:

import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Set;
import java.util.logging.Logger;
import junit.framework.TestSuite;

/**
 * This builder creates a composite test suite, containing a separate test suite for each {@link
 * CollectionSize} present in the features specified by {@link #withFeatures(Feature...)}.
 *
 * @param <B> The concrete type of this builder (the 'self-type'). All the Builder methods of this

 * ListenableFuture} directly.
 *
 * @author Sven Mawson
 * @author Nishant Thakkar
 * @since 1.0
 */
/*
 * Some of the annotations below were added after we released our separate
 * com.google.guava:listenablefuture:1.0 artifact. (For more on that artifact, see
 * https://github.com/google/guava/releases/tag/v27.0) This means that the copy of ListenableFuture

 * ListenableFuture} directly.
 *
 * @author Sven Mawson
 * @author Nishant Thakkar
 * @since 1.0
 */
/*
 * Some of the annotations below were added after we released our separate
 * com.google.guava:listenablefuture:1.0 artifact. (For more on that artifact, see
 * https://github.com/google/guava/releases/tag/v27.0) This means that the copy of ListenableFuture

     * key and value, which we pass to the superconstructor, even though the key and value type for
     * a given entry might not include null. The right fix for the header problems is probably to
     * define a separate MultimapLink interface with a separate "header" implementation, which
     * hopefully could avoid implementing Entry or ValueSetLink at all. (But note that that approach

        "Latch failed to count down within %d second timeout", timeoutSeconds);
  }

  /**
   * Creates a garbage object that counts down the latch in its finalizer. Sequestered into a
   * separate method to make it somewhat more likely to be unreachable.
   */
  private static void createUnreachableLatchFinalizer(CountDownLatch latch) {
    Object unused =
        new Object() {

import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Random;
import junit.framework.TestSuite;

/**
 * Unit test for {@link Files}.
 *
 * <p>Some methods are tested in separate files:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>{@link Files#fileTraverser()} is tested in {@link FilesFileTraverserTest}.
 *   <li>{@link Files#createTempDir()} is tested in {@link FilesCreateTempDirTest}.
 * </ul>
 *

      SleepingStopwatch stopwatch) {
    RateLimiter rateLimiter = new SmoothWarmingUp(stopwatch, warmupPeriod, unit, coldFactor);
    rateLimiter.setRate(permitsPerSecond);
    return rateLimiter;
  }

  /**
   * The underlying timer; used both to measure elapsed time and sleep as necessary. A separate
   * object to facilitate testing.
   */
  private final SleepingStopwatch stopwatch;

   * serialization and deserialization.
   */

  /**
   * Creates an {@code ArrayTable} with the mappings in the provided table.
   *
   * <p>If {@code table} includes a mapping with row key {@code r} and a separate mapping with
   * column key {@code c}, the returned table contains a mapping with row key {@code r} and column
   * key {@code c}. If that row key / column key pair in not in {@code table}, the pair maps to