* http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
 */

/*
 * Source:
 * http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/jsr166/src/test/tck-jsr166e/AtomicDoubleArrayTest.java?revision=1.13
 * (Modified to adapt to guava coding conventions)
 */

package com.google.common.util.concurrent;

import static org.junit.Assert.assertThrows;

import java.util.Arrays;

/** Unit test for {@link AtomicDoubleArray}. */

 * http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
 */

/*
 * Source:
 * http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/jsr166/src/test/tck-jsr166e/AtomicDoubleArrayTest.java?revision=1.13
 * (Modified to adapt to guava coding conventions)
 */

package com.google.common.util.concurrent;

import static java.lang.Math.max;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertThrows;

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtIncompatible;

 */
@GwtCompatible
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
public class UnmodifiableCollectionTests {

  public static void assertMapEntryIsUnmodifiable(Entry<?, ?> entry) {
    try {
      // fine because the call is going to fail without modifying the entry
      @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
      Entry<?, @Nullable Object> nullableValueEntry = (Entry<?, @Nullable Object>) entry;
      nullableValueEntry.setValue(null);

    // Now we hit the cap
    assertEquals(1 << 30, ImmutableSet.chooseTableSize(1 << 29));
    assertEquals(1 << 30, ImmutableSet.chooseTableSize((1 << 30) - 1));

    // Now we've gone too far
    assertThrows(IllegalArgumentException.class, () -> ImmutableSet.chooseTableSize(1 << 30));
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // RegularImmutableSet.table not in emulation
  public void testResizeTable() {

      } else {
        Helpers.assertEqualIgnoringOrder(expectedElements, targetElements);
      }
    }
  }

  private void recurse(int level) {
    // We're going to reuse the stimuli array 3^steps times by overwriting it
    // in a recursive loop.  Sneaky.
    if (level == stimuli.length) {
      // We've filled the array.
      compareResultsForThisListOfStimuli();
    } else {

   *
   * @throws NullPointerException if {@code elements} contains a null element
   */
  public static <E> ImmutableList<E> copyOf(Iterator<? extends E> elements) {
    // We special-case for 0 or 1 elements, but going further is madness.
    if (!elements.hasNext()) {
      return of();
    }
    E first = elements.next();
    if (!elements.hasNext()) {
      return of(first);
    } else {

  //
  // I probably can't remember all the reasons (it's possible you
  // could find them in the code review archives), but here are a few:
  //
  // 1. What about leaving/unlocking? Are you going to do
  //    guard.enter() paired with monitor.leave()? That might get
  //    confusing. It's nice for the finally block to look as close as
  //    possible to the thing right before the try. You could have

   * }</pre>
   */
  private static final SuccessorsFunction<Character> JAVADOC_GRAPH =
      createUndirectedGraph("ba", "ad", "be", "ac", "ec", "cf");

  /**
   * A diamond shaped directed graph (arrows going down):
   *
   * <pre>{@code
   *   a
   *  / \
   * b   c
   *  \ /
   *   d
   * }</pre>
   */
  private static final SuccessorsFunction<Character> DIAMOND_GRAPH =

   * This is a big deal - we're talking factors of 2-8 in microbenchmarks, not just 10-20%. (This is
   * a hotspot optimizer bug, which should be fixed, but that's a separate, big project).
   *
   * The coding pattern above is heavily used in java.util, e.g. in ArrayList. There is a
   * RangeCheckMicroBenchmark in the JDK that was used to test this.
   *

    for (int n = list.size() - 1; n > from; n--) {
      if (predicate.apply(list.get(n))) {
        list.remove(n);
      }
    }
    // And now remove everything in the range [to, from) (going backwards).
    for (int n = from - 1; n >= to; n--) {
      list.remove(n);
    }
  }

  /** Removes and returns the first matching element, or returns {@code null} if there is none. */
  @CheckForNull