*   <li>We need to be careful about how we suppress {@code suite()} methods in {@code common.io}.
 *       The generated suite for {@code FooTest} ends up containing {@code FooTest} itself plus some
 *       other tests. We want to exclude the other tests (which Android can't handle) while
 *       continuing to run {@code FooTest} itself. This is exactly what happens with {@code
 *       AndroidIncompatible}. But I'm not sure what would happen if we annotated the {@code

              <exclude>%regex[.*PackageSanityTests.*.class]</exclude>
              <!-- FeatureUtilTest.*ExampleDerivedInterfaceTester, com.google.common.io.*Tester, incidentally FeatureSpecificTestSuiteBuilderTest.MyAbstractTester (but we don't care either way because it's not meant to run on its own but works OK if it does)... but not NullPointerTesterTest, etc. -->
              <exclude>%regex[.*Tester.class]</exclude>

      </plugin>
      <plugin>
        <artifactId>maven-javadoc-plugin</artifactId>
        <configuration>
          <!-- Passing `-subpackages com.google.common` breaks things, so we explicitly exclude everything else instead. -->
          <!-- excludePackageNames requires specification of packages separately from "all subpackages".
               https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-584 -->

 *   <li>We need to be careful about how we suppress {@code suite()} methods in {@code common.io}.
 *       The generated suite for {@code FooTest} ends up containing {@code FooTest} itself plus some
 *       other tests. We want to exclude the other tests (which Android can't handle) while
 *       continuing to run {@code FooTest} itself. This is exactly what happens with {@code
 *       AndroidIncompatible}. But I'm not sure what would happen if we annotated the {@code

      </plugin>
      <plugin>
        <artifactId>maven-javadoc-plugin</artifactId>
        <configuration>
          <!-- Passing `-subpackages com.google.common` breaks things, so we explicitly exclude everything else instead. -->
          <!-- excludePackageNames requires specification of packages separately from "all subpackages".
               https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-584 -->

            <!-- Yes, we want to exclude ForceGuavaCompilation 4 times: -->
            <!-- (And we might as well exclude DummyJavadocClass 3 times (though it would be harmless to include).) -->
            <!-- 1. Don't compile it (since that requires a *non-test* dep on gwt-user. -->
            <exclude>**/ForceGuavaCompilation*</exclude>
            <exclude>**/DummyJavadocClass*</exclude>
          </excludes>
        </configuration>

public class InvokableTest extends TestCase {
  // Historically Invokable inherited from java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject. That's no longer the
  // case, but we do check that its API still has the same public methods. We exclude some methods
  // that were added in Java 9 and that people probably weren't calling via Invokable, namely
  // `boolean canAccess(Object)` and `boolean trySetAccessible()`.
  public void testApiCompatibleWithAccessibleObject() {

       *
       * We already know that that's how it behaves, and subclasses of Converter can't change that
       * behavior. So there's no sense in making all subclass authors exclude the method from any
       * NullPointerTester tests that they have.
       */
      ignoredMembers.add(Converter.class.getMethod("apply", Object.class));
    } catch (NoSuchMethodException shouldBeImpossible) {

  /**
   * If a hostname is not a key in the EXCLUDE map, and if removing its leftmost component results
   * in a name which is a key in this map, it is a public suffix.
   */
  public static final ImmutableMap<String, PublicSuffixType> UNDER =
      TrieParser.parseTrie(

       *
       * We already know that that's how it behaves, and subclasses of Converter can't change that
       * behavior. So there's no sense in making all subclass authors exclude the method from any
       * NullPointerTester tests that they have.
       */
      ignoredMembers.add(Converter.class.getMethod("apply", Object.class));
    } catch (NoSuchMethodException shouldBeImpossible) {