- Sort Score
- Result 10 results
- Languages All
Results 1 - 6 of 6 for wait (0.15 sec)
-
docs/en/docs/deployment/concepts.md
## Previous Steps Before Starting There are many cases where you want to perform some steps **before starting** your application. For example, you might want to run **database migrations**. But in most cases, you will want to perform these steps only **once**. So, you will want to have a **single process** to perform those **previous steps**, before starting the application.
Plain Text - Registered: Sun May 05 07:19:11 GMT 2024 - Last Modified: Thu May 02 22:37:31 GMT 2024 - 18K bytes - Viewed (0) -
docs/en/docs/release-notes.md
* Fix typos in Async docs. PR [#1423](https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi/pull/1423). ## 0.54.2 * Add translation to Spanish for [Concurrency and async / await - Concurrencia y async / await](https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/es/async/). PR [#1290](https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi/pull/1290) by [@alvaropernas](https://github.com/alvaropernas).
Plain Text - Registered: Sun May 05 07:19:11 GMT 2024 - Last Modified: Fri May 03 23:25:42 GMT 2024 - 388.1K bytes - Viewed (1) -
docs/en/docs/advanced/websockets.md
**FastAPI** provides the same `WebSocket` directly just as a convenience for you, the developer. But it comes directly from Starlette. ## Await for messages and send messages In your WebSocket route you can `await` for messages and send messages. ```Python hl_lines="48-52" {!../../../docs_src/websockets/tutorial001.py!} ``` You can receive and send binary, text, and JSON data.
Plain Text - Registered: Sun May 05 07:19:11 GMT 2024 - Last Modified: Thu May 02 22:37:31 GMT 2024 - 6.2K bytes - Viewed (0) -
README.md
Plain Text - Registered: Sun May 05 07:19:11 GMT 2024 - Last Modified: Thu May 02 22:37:31 GMT 2024 - 22.6K bytes - Viewed (0) -
docs/en/docs/index.md
Plain Text - Registered: Sun May 05 07:19:11 GMT 2024 - Last Modified: Thu May 02 22:37:31 GMT 2024 - 19.8K bytes - Viewed (0) -
docs/en/docs/deployment/docker.md
### One Process per Container In this type of scenario, you probably would want to have **a single (Uvicorn) process per container**, as you would already be handling replication at the cluster level. So, in this case, you **would not** want to have a process manager like Gunicorn with Uvicorn workers, or Uvicorn using its own Uvicorn workers. You would want to have just a **single Uvicorn process** per container (but probably multiple containers).
Plain Text - Registered: Sun May 05 07:19:11 GMT 2024 - Last Modified: Thu May 02 22:37:31 GMT 2024 - 34K bytes - Viewed (0)