app = FastAPI()


@app.get("/no_response_model-no_annotation-return_model")
def no_response_model_no_annotation_return_model():
    return User(name="John", surname="Doe")


@app.get("/no_response_model-no_annotation-return_dict")
def no_response_model_no_annotation_return_dict():
    return {"name": "John", "surname": "Doe"}


@app.get("/response_model-no_annotation-return_same_model", response_model=User)

from typing import List, Union

from fastapi import FastAPI, UploadFile
from fastapi._compat import (
    ModelField,
    Undefined,
    _get_model_config,
    is_bytes_sequence_annotation,
    is_uploadfile_sequence_annotation,
)
from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
from pydantic import BaseConfig, BaseModel, ConfigDict
from pydantic.fields import FieldInfo

from .utils import needs_pydanticv1, needs_pydanticv2

            self.deprecated = deprecated
        else:
            kwargs["deprecated"] = deprecated
        if PYDANTIC_V2:
            kwargs.update(
                {
                    "annotation": annotation,
                    "alias_priority": alias_priority,
                    "validation_alias": validation_alias,
                    "serialization_alias": serialization_alias,
                    "strict": strict,

This simple case is handled automatically by FastAPI because the return type annotation is the class (or a subclass) of `Response`.

And tools will also be happy because both `RedirectResponse` and `JSONResponse` are subclasses of `Response`, so the type annotation is correct.

### Annotate a Response Subclass

You can also use a subclass of `Response` in the type annotation:

```Python hl_lines="8-9"

7. Here the `response_model` is using a type annotation of a list of `Author` dataclasses.

    Again, you can combine `dataclasses` with standard type annotations.

8. Notice that this *path operation function* uses regular `def` instead of `async def`.

    As always, in FastAPI you can combine `def` and `async def` as needed.

            f"check that {type_} is a valid Pydantic field type. "
            "If you are using a return type annotation that is not a valid Pydantic "
            "field (e.g. Union[Response, dict, None]) you can disable generating the "
            "response model from the type annotation with the path operation decorator "
            "parameter response_model=None. Read more: "

            router_param: inspect.Parameter = router_sig.parameters[key]
            app_param: inspect.Parameter = app_sig.parameters[key]
            assert param.annotation == router_param.annotation
            assert param.annotation == app_param.annotation
            assert param.default == router_param.default

### Declare a *path parameter*

Then create a *path parameter* with a type annotation using the enum class you created (`ModelName`):

```Python hl_lines="16"
{!../../../docs_src/path_params/tutorial005.py!}
```

### Check the docs

### Déclarer un paramètre de chemin

Créez ensuite un *paramètre de chemin* avec une annotation de type désignant l'énumération créée précédemment (`ModelName`) :

```Python hl_lines="16"
{!../../../docs_src/path_params/tutorial005.py!}
```

### Documentation

    ```

## Declare `Cookie` parameters

Then declare the cookie parameters using the same structure as with `Path` and `Query`.

The first value is the default value, you can pass all the extra validation or annotation parameters:

=== "Python 3.10+"

    ```Python hl_lines="9"
    {!> ../../../docs_src/cookie_params/tutorial001_an_py310.py!}
    ```

=== "Python 3.9+"

    ```Python hl_lines="9"