* identical to the original.
 *
 * @author Chris Povirk
 */
/*
 * The whole thing is really @GwtIncompatible, but GwtJUnitConvertedTestModule doesn't have a
 * parameter for non-GWT, non-test files, and it didn't seem worth adding one for this unusual case.
 */
@GwtCompatible(emulated = true)
final class LenientSerializableTester {
  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): move this to c.g.c.testing if we allow for c.g.c.annotations dependencies so

    // inclusive.
    //
    // Note: According to the spec, a NumberFormatException is thrown for a number that is not
    // parseable, but the spec doesn't seem to say which exception is thrown for an invalid radix.
    // In contrast to the JVM, Kotlin native throws an Illegal argument exception in this case
    // (which seems to make more sense).
    try {

or Longitude either, but thought they were nice grand words to
say.)

  Presently she began again.  `I wonder if I shall fall right
THROUGH the earth!  How funny it'll seem to come out among the
people that walk with their heads downward!  The Antipathies, I
think--' (she was rather glad there WAS no one listening, this
time, as it didn't sound at all the right word) `--but I shall

          K[] sortedKs = (K[]) sortedKeys;
          Arrays.sort(sortedKs, comparator);
          Object[] sortedValues = new Object[size];

          // We might, somehow, be able to reorder values in-place.  But it doesn't seem like
          // there's a way around creating the separate sortedKeys array, and if we're allocating
          // one array of size n, we might as well allocate two -- to say nothing of the allocation

 * identical to the original.
 *
 * @author Chris Povirk
 */
/*
 * The whole thing is really @GwtIncompatible, but GwtJUnitConvertedTestModule doesn't have a
 * parameter for non-GWT, non-test files, and it didn't seem worth adding one for this unusual case.
 */
@GwtCompatible(emulated = true)
final class LenientSerializableTester {
  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): move this to c.g.c.testing if we allow for c.g.c.annotations dependencies so

    validations:
      required: true

  - type: markdown
    attributes:
      value: >
        Did you *actually* encounter the need for this enhancement in a real-world scenario, or does
        it just seem like a sensible behavior for the feature to have?


        Before we make significant changes to existing features in Guava, we really want to be sure

    // inclusive.
    //
    // Note: According to the spec, a NumberFormatException is thrown for a number that is not
    // parseable, but the spec doesn't seem to say which exception is thrown for an invalid radix.
    // In contrast to the JVM, Kotlin native throws an Illegal argument exception in this case
    // (which seems to make more sense).
    try {

  public void addListener(Runnable listener, Executor executor) {
    checkNotNull(listener, "Runnable was null.");
    checkNotNull(executor, "Executor was null.");
    // Checking isDone and listeners != TOMBSTONE may seem redundant, but our contract for
    // addListener says that listeners execute 'immediate' if the future isDone(). However, our
    // protocol for completing a future is to assign the value field (which sets isDone to true) and

/*
 * @Ignore affects the Android test runner (and only the Android test runner): It respects JUnit 4
 * annotations even on JUnit 3 tests.
 *
 * TODO(b/225350400): Remove @Ignore, which doesn't seem like it should be necessary and probably
 * soon won't be.
 */
@SuppressWarnings("JUnit4ClassUsedInJUnit3")
@Ignore
public final class MyTester extends AbstractTester<@Nullable Void> {

  // happens. But the thread's supposedly separate ClassLoader actually has a reference to the app's
  // ClasLoader via its AccessControlContext. It does not seem to be possible to make a
  // URLClassLoader without capturing this reference, and it probably would not be desirable for
  // security reasons anyway. Therefore, the FRQ.close() method provides a way to stop the thread