it, or at any rate a book of rules for shutting people up like
telescopes:  this time she found a little bottle on it, (`which
certainly was not here before,' said Alice,) and round the neck
of the bottle was a paper label, with the words `DRINK ME'
beautifully printed on it in large letters.

  It was all very well to say `Drink me,' but the wise little
Alice was not going to do THAT in a hurry.  `No, I'll look

    assertEquals("string with spaces", spaceEscaper.escape("string with spaces"));
  }

  /** Tests that if we add extra 'safe' characters they remain unescaped */
  public void testCustomEscaper() {
    UnicodeEscaper e = new PercentEscaper("+*/-", false);
    for (char c = 0; c < 128; c++) {
      if ((c >= '0' && c <= '9')
          || (c >= 'a' && c <= 'z')
          || (c >= 'A' && c <= 'Z')

public final class PercentEscaper extends UnicodeEscaper {

  // In some escapers spaces are escaped to '+'
  private static final char[] PLUS_SIGN = {'+'};

  // Percent escapers output upper case hex digits (uri escapers require this).
  private static final char[] UPPER_HEX_DIGITS = "0123456789ABCDEF".toCharArray();

  /** If true we should convert space to the {@code +} character. */
  private final boolean plusForSpace;

  /**

    assertEscaping(e, "%29", ')');
    assertEscaping(e, "%7E", '~');
    assertEscaping(e, "%27", '\'');

    // Plus for spaces
    assertEscaping(e, "+", ' ');
    assertEscaping(e, "%2B", '+');

    assertEquals("safe+with+spaces", e.escape("safe with spaces"));
    assertEquals("foo%40bar.com", e.escape("******@****.***"));
  }

  public void testUrlPathSegmentEscaper() {

    assertEquals("string with spaces", spaceEscaper.escape("string with spaces"));
  }

  /** Tests that if we add extra 'safe' characters they remain unescaped */
  public void testCustomEscaper() {
    UnicodeEscaper e = new PercentEscaper("+*/-", false);
    for (char c = 0; c < 128; c++) {
      if ((c >= '0' && c <= '9')
          || (c >= 'a' && c <= 'z')
          || (c >= 'A' && c <= 'Z')

    // deal with camel conversion
    StringBuilder out = null;
    int i = 0;
    int j = -1;
    while ((j = wordBoundary.indexIn(s, ++j)) != -1) {
      if (i == 0) {
        // include some extra space for separators
        out = new StringBuilder(s.length() + 4 * format.wordSeparator.length());
        out.append(format.normalizeFirstWord(s.substring(i, j)));
      } else {

 * control. Under low update contention, the two classes have similar characteristics. But under
 * high contention, expected throughput of this class is significantly higher, at the expense of
 * higher space consumption.
 *
 * <p>This class extends {@link Number}, but does not define methods such as {@code
 * equals}, {@code hashCode} and {@code compareTo} because instances are expected to be mutated, and

    checkArgument(bufferSize % chunkSize == 0);

    // TODO(user): benchmark performance difference with longer buffer
    // always space for a single primitive
    this.buffer = ByteBuffer.allocate(bufferSize + 7).order(ByteOrder.LITTLE_ENDIAN);
    this.bufferSize = bufferSize;
    this.chunkSize = chunkSize;
  }

   *
   * <p>CharStreams.copy was failing to clear its CharBuffer after each read call, which effectively
   * reduced the available size of the buffer each time a call to read didn't fill up the available
   * space in the buffer completely. In general this is a performance problem since the buffer size
   * is permanently reduced, but with certain Reader implementations it could also cause the buffer
   * size to reach 0, causing an infinite loop.

   *
   * <p>CharStreams.copy was failing to clear its CharBuffer after each read call, which effectively
   * reduced the available size of the buffer each time a call to read didn't fill up the available
   * space in the buffer completely. In general this is a performance problem since the buffer size
   * is permanently reduced, but with certain Reader implementations it could also cause the buffer
   * size to reach 0, causing an infinite loop.