* implemented as "no-effort". No interrupts or other attempts are made to stop threads executing
   * tasks. Second, the returned list will always be empty, as any submitted task is considered to
   * have started execution. This applies also to tasks given to {@code invokeAll} or {@code
   * invokeAny} which are pending serial execution, even the subset of the tasks that have not yet

    }
  }

  private static class NoOpService extends AbstractService {
    boolean running = false;

    @Override
    protected void doStart() {
      assertFalse(running);
      running = true;
      notifyStarted();
    }

    @Override
    protected void doStop() {
      assertTrue(running);
      running = false;
      notifyStopped();
    }
  }

afraid of interrupting him,) `I'll give him sixpence.  _I_ don't
believe there's an atom of meaning in it.'

  The jury all wrote down on their slates, `SHE doesn't believe
there's an atom of meaning in it,' but none of them attempted to
explain the paper.

  `If there's no meaning in it,' said the King, `that saves a
world of trouble, you know, as we needn't try to find any.  And

  enum WorkerRunningState {
    /** Runnable is not running and not queued for execution */
    IDLE,
    /** Runnable is not running, but is being queued for execution */
    QUEUING,
    /** runnable has been submitted but has not yet begun execution */
    QUEUED,
    RUNNING,
  }

  /** Underlying executor that all submitted Runnable objects are run on. */

    // Test default state of not started.
    assertEquals(1, listenerLatch.getCount());
    assertFalse(task.isDone());
    assertFalse(task.isCancelled());

    // Start the task to put it in the RUNNING state.  Have to use a separate
    // thread because the task will block on the task latch after unblocking
    // the run latch.
    exec.execute(task);
    runLatch.await();
    assertEquals(1, listenerLatch.getCount());

       * old versions of Android. Since Android doesn't use that code path, anyway, there's no need
       * to test it.
       */
      return;
    }

    /*
     * Only under Windows (or hypothetically when running with some other non-POSIX, ACL-based
     * filesystem) does our prod code look up the username. Thus, this test doesn't necessarily test
     * anything interesting under most environments. Still, we can run it (except for Android, at

      - master
  pull_request:
    branches:
      - master

permissions:
  contents: read

jobs:
  test:
    permissions:
      actions: write  # for styfle/cancel-workflow-action to cancel/stop running workflows
      contents: read  # for actions/checkout to fetch code
    name: "${{ matrix.root-pom }} on JDK ${{ matrix.java }} on ${{ matrix.os }}"
    strategy:
      matrix:
        os: [ ubuntu-latest ]

  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see https://goo.gl/pRV3Yn for details.

  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see https://goo.gl/pRV3Yn for details.

  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see https://goo.gl/pRV3Yn for details.