// Note that if all the futures on the list are done prior to completing this loop, the last
      // call to addListener() will callback to setOneValue(), transitively call our cleanup
      // listener, and set this.futures to null.
      // This is not actually a problem, since the foreach only needs this.futures to be non-null
      // at the beginning of the loop.
      int i = 0;

         configurations downstream, and GWT uses the runtime configuration for
         its builds. Thus, GWT doesn't get j2objc-annotations transitively, in
         contrast to the other deps of `guava`, which it does get transitively.
         (Arguably we should redeclare *all* the `guava` deps here.) -->
    <dependency>
      <groupId>com.google.j2objc</groupId>
      <artifactId>j2objc-annotations</artifactId>

    return false;
  }

  /**
   * Returns the transitive closure of {@code graph}. The transitive closure of a graph is another
   * graph with an edge connecting node A to node B if node B is {@link #reachableNodes(Graph,
   * Object) reachable} from node A.
   *
   * <p>This is a "snapshot" based on the current topology of {@code graph}, rather than a live view

   *       Double.NEGATIVE_INFINITY} are fuzzily equal only to themselves.
   * </ul>
   *
   * <p>This is reflexive and symmetric, but not transitive, so it is not an
   * equivalence relation and not suitable for use in {@link Object#equals}
   * implementations.
   *
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code tolerance} is {@code < 0} or NaN

   * <p>Note that if {@code a.encloses(b)}, then {@code b.contains(v)} implies {@code
   * a.contains(v)}, but as the last two examples illustrate, the converse is not always true.
   *
   * <p>Being reflexive, antisymmetric and transitive, the {@code encloses} relation defines a
   * <i>partial order</i> over ranges. There exists a unique {@linkplain Range#all maximal} range

   *       (<i>symmetric</i> property)
   *   <li>If {@code equivalent(x, y)} and {@code equivalent(y, z)} are both true, then {@code
   *       equivalent(x, z)} is also true (<i>transitive</i> property)
   * </ul>
   *
   * <p>Note that all calls to {@code equivalent(x, y)} are expected to return the same result as
   * long as neither {@code x} nor {@code y} is modified.
   */

   *       (<i>symmetric</i> property)
   *   <li>If {@code equivalent(x, y)} and {@code equivalent(y, z)} are both true, then {@code
   *       equivalent(x, z)} is also true (<i>transitive</i> property)
   * </ul>
   *
   * <p>Note that all calls to {@code equivalent(x, y)} are expected to return the same result as
   * long as neither {@code x} nor {@code y} is modified.
   */