4. Please squash all commits for a change into a single commit (this can be
     done using `git rebase -i`). Do your best to have a
     [well-formed commit message][] for the change.

[Java style guide]: https://google.github.io/styleguide/javaguide.html
[well-formed commit message]: https://tbaggery.com/2008/04/19/a-note-about-git-commit-messages.html

#### Merging pull requests ####

   * even worse. For now, we just suppress and move on with our lives.
   *
   * - https://github.com/jspecify/jspecify/issues/65
   *
   * - https://github.com/jspecify/jdk/commit/71d826792b8c7ef95d492c50a274deab938f2552
   */
  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): Is the unchecked cast avoidable? Would System.arraycopy be similarly fast (if

                   though we don't run Error Prone itself, which no longer
                   supports JDK8!).

                   Why? At some point, presumably after
                   https://github.com/google/guava/commit/e06a8cec65815599e510d7f9c1ea9d2a8eaa438a,
                   builds with JDK8 began failing animal-sniffer with the error:

                   Failed to check signatures: Bad class file .../CollectionFuture$ListFuture.class

   * Iterables#filter(Iterable, Class)} for related functionality.)
   *
   * <p><b>{@code Stream} equivalent:</b> {@link java.util.stream.Stream#filter Stream.filter}.
   */
  // TODO(kevinb): how can we omit that Iterables link when building gwt
  // javadoc?
  public static <E extends @Nullable Object> Collection<E> filter(
      Collection<E> unfiltered, Predicate<? super E> predicate) {

      for (int i = 0, n = origStackTrace.length; i < n; i++) {
        if (WithExplicitOrdering.class.getName().equals(origStackTrace[i].getClassName())) {
          // For pre-populated disallowedPriorLocks edges, omit the stack trace.
          setStackTrace(EMPTY_STACK_TRACE);
          break;
        }
        if (!EXCLUDED_CLASS_NAMES.contains(origStackTrace[i].getClassName())) {

   *
   * <p>That iterator supports {@code remove()} if {@code iterable.iterator()} does. After {@code
   * remove()} is called, subsequent cycles omit the removed element, which is no longer in {@code
   * iterable}. The iterator's {@code hasNext()} method returns {@code true} until {@code iterable}
   * is empty.
   *

 *       where the {@code ...} contains the names of all the other {@code ParametricNullness}
 *       annotations in Guava. Or you might prefer to omit Guava from your {@code AnnotatedPackages}
 *       list.
 *   <li><a href="https://developers.google.com/j2objc">J2ObjC</a>
 *   <li>{@code NullPointerTester}, at least in the Android backport (where the type-use annotations

 *       where the {@code ...} contains the names of all the other {@code ParametricNullness}
 *       annotations in Guava. Or you might prefer to omit Guava from your {@code AnnotatedPackages}
 *       list.
 *   <li><a href="https://developers.google.com/j2objc">J2ObjC</a>
 *   <li>{@code NullPointerTester}, at least in the Android backport (where the type-use annotations

 *       where the {@code ...} contains the names of all the other {@code ParametricNullness}
 *       annotations in Guava. Or you might prefer to omit Guava from your {@code AnnotatedPackages}
 *       list.
 *   <li><a href="https://developers.google.com/j2objc">J2ObjC</a>
 *   <li>{@code NullPointerTester}, at least in the Android backport (where the type-use annotations

 *       where the {@code ...} contains the names of all the other {@code ParametricNullness}
 *       annotations in Guava. Or you might prefer to omit Guava from your {@code AnnotatedPackages}
 *       list.
 *   <li><a href="https://developers.google.com/j2objc">J2ObjC</a>
 *   <li>{@code NullPointerTester}, at least in the Android backport (where the type-use annotations