.add("in", "the", "quick", "jumped", "over", "a")
            .build();
    assertThat(set).containsExactly("a", "in", "the", "over", "quick", "jumped").inOrder();
  }

  public void testExplicit_ordering_dupes() {
    SortedSet<String> set =
        ImmutableSortedSet.orderedBy(STRING_LENGTH)
            .add("in", "the", "quick", "brown", "fox", "jumped", "over", "a", "lazy", "dog")
            .build();

   * reached, but not the other, the shorter iterable is considered to be less than the longer one.
   * For example, a lexicographical natural ordering over integers considers {@code [] < [1] < [1,
   * 1] < [1, 2] < [2]}.
   *
   * <p>Note that {@code Collections.reverseOrder(lexicographical(comparator))} is not equivalent to

    throwable.printStackTrace(new PrintWriter(stringWriter));
    return stringWriter.toString();
  }

  /**
   * Returns the stack trace of {@code throwable}, possibly providing slower iteration over the full
   * trace but faster iteration over parts of the trace. Here, "slower" and "faster" are defined in
   * comparison to the normal way to access the stack trace, {@link Throwable#getStackTrace()

    throwable.printStackTrace(new PrintWriter(stringWriter));
    return stringWriter.toString();
  }

  /**
   * Returns the stack trace of {@code throwable}, possibly providing slower iteration over the full
   * trace but faster iteration over parts of the trace. Here, "slower" and "faster" are defined in
   * comparison to the normal way to access the stack trace, {@link Throwable#getStackTrace()

            .add("in", "the", "quick", "jumped", "over", "a")
            .build();
    assertThat(set).containsExactly("a", "in", "the", "over", "quick", "jumped").inOrder();
  }

  public void testExplicit_ordering_dupes() {
    SortedSet<String> set =
        ImmutableSortedSet.orderedBy(STRING_LENGTH)
            .add("in", "the", "quick", "brown", "fox", "jumped", "over", "a", "lazy", "dog")
            .build();

      return ((Set<?>) iterable).contains(element) ? 1 : 0;
    }
    return Iterators.frequency(iterable.iterator(), element);
  }

  /**
   * Returns an iterable whose iterators cycle indefinitely over the elements of {@code iterable}.
   *
   * <p>That iterator supports {@code remove()} if {@code iterable.iterator()} does. After {@code

 * consumption at the price of moderately increased constant factors of CPU. Only use this class
 * when there is a specific reason to prioritize memory over CPU.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
@J2ktIncompatible // no support for access-order mode in LinkedHashMap delegate
@GwtIncompatible // not worth using in GWT for now
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault

   * convenient.
   *
   * <p>By default, a {@code Builder} will generate bimaps that iterate over entries in the order
   * they were inserted into the builder. For example, in the above example, {@code
   * WORD_TO_INT.entrySet()} is guaranteed to iterate over the entries in the order {@code "one"=1,
   * "two"=2, "three"=3}, and {@code keySet()} and {@code values()} respect the same order. If you

   * convenient.
   *
   * <p>By default, a {@code Builder} will generate maps that iterate over entries in the order they
   * were inserted into the builder, equivalently to {@code LinkedHashMap}. For example, in the
   * above example, {@code WORD_TO_INT.entrySet()} is guaranteed to iterate over the entries in the
   * order {@code "one"=1, "two"=2, "three"=3}, and {@code keySet()} and {@code values()} respect

   * <p><b>Warning:</b> a new random seed for these functions is chosen each time the {@code
   * Hashing} class is loaded. <b>Do not use this method</b> if hash codes may escape the current
   * process in any way, for example being sent over RPC, or saved to disk. For a general-purpose,
   * non-cryptographic hash function that will never change behavior, we suggest {@link
   * #murmur3_128}.
   *