}

  private void setSuccessor(int entry, int succ) {
    long succMask = (~0L) >>> 32;
    setLink(entry, (link(entry) & ~succMask) | ((succ + 1) & succMask));
  }

  private void setPredecessor(int entry, int pred) {
    long predMask = ~0L << 32;
    setLink(entry, (link(entry) & ~predMask) | ((long) (pred + 1) << 32));
  }

  private void setSucceeds(int pred, int succ) {

    /*
     * No mutable Table exactly matches the insertion order behavior of ImmutableTable.Builder, but
     * the Builder can't efficiently support merging of duplicate values.  Getting around this
     * requires some work.
     */

    return Collector.of(
        ImmutableTableCollectorState<R, C, V>::new,
        (state, input) ->
            state.put(

      if (!executed) {
        runnables = new RunnableExecutorPair(runnable, executor, runnables);
        return;
      }
    }
    // Execute the runnable immediately. Because of scheduling this may end up getting called before
    // some of the previously added runnables, but we're OK with that. If we want to change the
    // contract to guarantee ordering among runnables we'd have to modify the logic here to allow
    // it.

  }

  private void setSuccessor(int entry, int succ) {
    long succMask = (~0L) >>> 32;
    setLink(entry, (link(entry) & ~succMask) | ((succ + 1) & succMask));
  }

  private void setPredecessor(int entry, int pred) {
    long predMask = ~0L << 32;
    setLink(entry, (link(entry) & ~predMask) | ((long) (pred + 1) << 32));
  }

  private void setSucceeds(int pred, int succ) {

        if (counts[i] >= 0) {
          sortedCounts[index] += counts[i];
        } else {
          sortedCounts[index] = ~counts[i];
        }
      }
      // Note that we're not getting rid, yet, of elements with count 0.  We'll do that in build().
      this.elements = sortedElements;
      this.counts = sortedCounts;
      this.length = uniques;
    }

    /**