Comparator<? super K> comparator = map.comparator();
    if (comparator == null) {
      // If map has a null comparator, the keys should have a natural ordering,
      // even though K doesn't explicitly implement Comparable.
      comparator = (Comparator<? super K>) NATURAL_ORDER;
    }
    if (map instanceof ImmutableSortedMap) {
      // TODO(kevinb): Prove that this cast is safe, even though

     * ImmutableSortedSet#orderedBy}.
     */
    /*
     * TODO(cpovirk): use Object[] instead of E[] in the mainline? (The backport is different and
     * doesn't need this suppression, but we keep it to minimize diffs.) Generally be more clear
     * about when we have an Object[] vs. a Comparable[] or other array type in internalArray? If we

    public SetMultimap<K, V> delegate() {
      return (SetMultimap<K, V>) super.delegate();
    }

    @Override
    public Set<V> get(@ParametricNullness K key) {
      /*
       * Note that this doesn't return a SortedSet when delegate is a
       * SortedSetMultiset, unlike (SortedSet<V>) super.get().
       */
      return Collections.unmodifiableSet(delegate().get(key));
    }

    @Override

         * safe, even though javac can't tell.
         *
         * Sun bug 6665356 is an additional complication. Until OpenJDK 7, javac
         * doesn't recognize this kind of cast as unchecked cast. Neither does
         * Eclipse 3.4. Right now, this suppression is mostly unnecessary.
         */
        @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")

            obvious way to ensure that.

            We could consider arranging things so that only the tests we know need this would get
            the add-opens. Right now that doesn't seem worth the effort, though.
        -->
        <test.add.opens>
          --add-opens java.base/java.lang=ALL-UNNAMED
          --add-opens java.base/java.util=ALL-UNNAMED

     * ImmutableSortedSet#orderedBy}.
     */
    /*
     * TODO(cpovirk): use Object[] instead of E[] in the mainline? (The backport is different and
     * doesn't need this suppression, but we keep it to minimize diffs.) Generally be more clear
     * about when we have an Object[] vs. a Comparable[] or other array type in internalArray? If we

   *
   * <p>The resulting collection's iterator does not support {@code remove()}, but all other
   * collection methods are supported. When given an element that doesn't satisfy the predicate, the
   * collection's {@code add()} and {@code addAll()} methods throw an {@link
   * IllegalArgumentException}. When methods such as {@code removeAll()} and {@code clear()} are

        if (argValue == null) {
          // When a parameter of a @Generates method cannot be created,
          // The type most likely is a collection.
          // Our distinct proxy doesn't work for collections.
          // So just refuse to generate.
          return null;
        }
        args.add(argValue);
      }
      return invokeGeneratorMethod(generate, args.toArray());
    }

    assertEquals(asList(1, 2), partitions.get(0));
    assertEquals(asList(3), partitions.get(1));
  }

  @J2ktIncompatible // Arrays.asList(...).subList() doesn't implement RandomAccess in J2KT.
  @GwtIncompatible // ArrayList.subList doesn't implement RandomAccess in GWT.
  public void testPartitionRandomAccessTrue() {
    List<Integer> source = asList(1, 2, 3);

      for (AvlNode<E> current = header.succ(); current != header; ) {
        AvlNode<E> next = current.succ();

        current.elemCount = 0;
        // Also clear these fields so that one deleted Entry doesn't retain all elements.
        current.left = null;
        current.right = null;
        current.pred = null;
        current.succ = null;

        current = next;
      }
      successor(header, header);