table.put("cat", 1, 'b');
    table.clear();
    populate(table, data);
    return table;
  }

  public void testCreateExplicitComparators() {
    table = TreeBasedTable.create(Collections.reverseOrder(), Ordering.usingToString());
    table.put("foo", 3, 'a');
    table.put("foo", 12, 'b');
    table.put("bar", 5, 'c');
    table.put("cat", 8, 'd');

    final Table<R, C, MutableCell<R, C, V>> table = HashBasedTable.create();

    void put(R row, C column, V value, BinaryOperator<V> merger) {
      MutableCell<R, C, V> oldCell = table.get(row, column);
      if (oldCell == null) {
        MutableCell<R, C, V> cell = new MutableCell<>(row, column, value);
        insertionOrder.add(cell);
        table.put(row, column, cell);
      } else {

   * The pointer to a key is stored in hashTable[Hashing.smear(key.hashCode()) % table.length],
   * save that if that location is already full, we try the next index, and the next, until we
   * find an empty table position.  Since the table has a power-of-two size, we use
   * & (table.length - 1) instead of % table.length, though.
   */

  @CheckForNull private final transient Object hashTable;

  }

  @Generates
  static <R, C, V> Table<R, C, V> generateTable(R row, C column, V value) {
    return generateHashBasedTable(row, column, value);
  }

  @Generates
  static <R, C, V> HashBasedTable<R, C, V> generateHashBasedTable(R row, C column, V value) {
    HashBasedTable<R, C, V> table = HashBasedTable.create();
    table.put(row, column, value);
    return table;
  }

 * function doing a good job of distributing the elements to the buckets to a distribution not far
 * from uniform), and amortized since some operations can trigger a hash table resize.
 *
 * <p>As compared with {@link java.util.LinkedHashMap}, this structure places significantly reduced
 * load on the garbage collector by only using a constant number of internal objects.
 *

   * UnsupportedOperationException}; this should only apply to {@code getAnnotatedBounds()}. This
   * does mean that users on Java 8 who obtain an instance of {@code TypeVariable} from {@link
   * TypeResolver#resolveType} will not be able to call {@code getAnnotatedBounds()} on it, but that
   * should hopefully be rare.
   *
   * <p>TODO(b/147144588): We are currently also missing the methods inherited from {@link

         * MultiExceptionListIterator. Because we're inside an
         * AbstractIteratorTester<E>, that's implicitly a cast to
         * AbstractIteratorTester<E>.MultiExceptionListIterator. The runtime
         * won't be able to verify the AbstractIteratorTester<E> part, so it's
         * an unchecked cast. We know, however, that the only possible value for
         * the type parameter is <E>, since otherwise the

     * doesn't need this suppression, but we keep it to minimize diffs.) Generally be more clear
     * about when we have an Object[] vs. a Comparable[] or other array type in internalArray? If we
     * used Object[], we might be able to optimize toArray() to use clone() sometimes. (See
     * cl/592273615 and cl/592273683.)
     */
    @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
    public Builder(Comparator<? super E> comparator) {

          K[] sortedKs = (K[]) sortedKeys;
          Arrays.sort(sortedKs, comparator);
          Object[] sortedValues = new Object[size];

          // We might, somehow, be able to reorder values in-place.  But it doesn't seem like
          // there's a way around creating the separate sortedKeys array, and if we're allocating

    table.put("cat", 1, 'b');
    table.clear();
    populate(table, data);
    return table;
  }

  public void testCreateExplicitComparators() {
    table = TreeBasedTable.create(Collections.reverseOrder(), Ordering.usingToString());
    table.put("foo", 3, 'a');
    table.put("foo", 12, 'b');
    table.put("bar", 5, 'c');
    table.put("cat", 8, 'd');