*       {@code consistentHash} will handle it. If, however, you are dividing traffic among
   *       servers {@code alpha}, {@code bravo}, and {@code charlie} and you occasionally need to
   *       take each of the servers offline, {@code consistentHash} will be a poor fit: It provides
   *       no way for you to specify which of the three buckets is disappearing. Thus, if your

        uses: actions/setup-java@99b8673ff64fbf99d8d325f52d9a5bdedb8483e9 # v4.2.1
        with:
          java-version: 21
          distribution: 'zulu'
          server-id: sonatype-nexus-snapshots
          server-username: CI_DEPLOY_USERNAME
          server-password: CI_DEPLOY_PASSWORD
          cache: 'maven'
      - name: 'Publish'
        env:
          CI_DEPLOY_USERNAME: ${{ secrets.CI_DEPLOY_USERNAME }}

          "www",
          "abc.a23",
          "biz.com.ua",
          "x",
          "fOo",
          "f--o",
          "f_a",
          "foo.net.us\uFF61ocm",
          "woo.com.",
          "8server.shop",
          "123.cn",
          "a" + DELTA + "b.com",
          ALMOST_TOO_MANY_LEVELS,
          ALMOST_TOO_LONG);

  private static final ImmutableSet<String> INVALID_NAME =
      ImmutableSet.of(

  }

  /**
   * Returns an estimate of the number of threads waiting for the given guard to become satisfied.
   * Note that because timeouts and interrupts may occur at any time, the estimate serves only as an
   * upper bound on the actual number of waiters. This method is designed for use in monitoring of
   * the system state, not for synchronization control.
   */
  public int getWaitQueueLength(Guard guard) {

     * ensure that completed write operations performed by other threads are noticed. For most
     * purposes, the "count" field, tracking the number of elements, serves as that volatile
     * variable ensuring visibility. This is convenient because this field needs to be read in many
     * read operations anyway:
     *

    String serverStr = "65.54.227.120";
    String clientStr = "192.0.2.45";
    int port = 40000;
    int flags = 0x8000;

    InetAddress ip = InetAddresses.forString(validTeredoAddress);
    assertTrue(InetAddresses.isTeredoAddress((Inet6Address) ip));
    InetAddresses.TeredoInfo teredo = InetAddresses.getTeredoInfo((Inet6Address) ip);

    InetAddress server = InetAddresses.forString(serverStr);

    state = State.CANCELLED;
    notifyAndClearListeners();

    if (delegate != null) {
      // TODO(lukes): consider adding the StackOverflowError protection from the server version
      delegate.cancel(mayInterruptIfRunning);
    }

    return true;
  }

  protected void interruptTask() {}

  @Override
  public boolean isCancelled() {

   * 4380</a>.
   *
   * @since 5.0
   */
  public static final class TeredoInfo {
    private final Inet4Address server;
    private final Inet4Address client;
    private final int port;
    private final int flags;

    /**
     * Constructs a TeredoInfo instance.
     *
     * <p>Both server and client can be {@code null}, in which case the value {@code "0.0.0.0"} will
     * be assumed.
     *

       * fastest (more than twice as fast as the Java implementation, vs ~1.5x with non-final static
       * fields, on x86_32) under the Hotspot server compiler. The reason is obviously that the
       * non-final fields need to be reloaded inside the loop.
       *
       * And, no, defining (final or not) local variables out of the loop still isn't as good

          "www",
          "abc.a23",
          "biz.com.ua",
          "x",
          "fOo",
          "f--o",
          "f_a",
          "foo.net.us\uFF61ocm",
          "woo.com.",
          "8server.shop",
          "123.cn",
          "a" + DELTA + "b.com",
          ALMOST_TOO_MANY_LEVELS,
          ALMOST_TOO_LONG);

  private static final ImmutableSet<String> INVALID_NAME =
      ImmutableSet.of(