Policy.setPolicy(policy);

      try {
        r.run();
      } finally {
        policy.addPermission(new SecurityPermission("setPolicy"));
        Policy.setPolicy(savedPolicy);
      }
    }
  }

  /** Runs a runnable without any permissions. */
  public void runWithoutPermissions(Runnable r) {
    runWithPermissions(r);
  }

  private <E extends Enum<E>>
      CycleDetectingLockFactory.WithExplicitOrdering<E> newInstanceWithExplicitOrdering(
          Class<E> enumClass, Policy policy) {
    return new CycleDetectingLockFactory.WithExplicitOrdering<E>(
        policy, CycleDetectingLockFactory.createNodes(enumClass));
  }

  public void testDeadlock_twoLocks() {
    // Establish an acquisition order of lockA -> lockB.
    lockA.lock();

  private <E extends Enum<E>>
      CycleDetectingLockFactory.WithExplicitOrdering<E> newInstanceWithExplicitOrdering(
          Class<E> enumClass, Policy policy) {
    return new CycleDetectingLockFactory.WithExplicitOrdering<E>(
        policy, CycleDetectingLockFactory.createNodes(enumClass));
  }

  public void testDeadlock_twoLocks() {
    // Establish an acquisition order of lockA -> lockB.
    lockA.lock();

 * limitations under the License.
 */

package com.google.common.collect;

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtCompatible;

/**
 * Dummy class that makes the GWT serialization policy happy. It isn't used on the server-side.
 *
 * @author Hayward Chan
 */
@GwtCompatible(emulated = true)
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
class ForwardingImmutableCollection {

# This workflow uses actions that are not certified by GitHub. They are provided
# by a third-party and are governed by separate terms of service, privacy
# policy, and support documentation.

name: Scorecard supply-chain security
on:
  # For Branch-Protection check. Only the default branch is supported. See
  # https://github.com/ossf/scorecard/blob/main/docs/checks.md#branch-protection
  branch_protection_rule:

         * large that doing the lookup is noticeably slower than redoing the work would be.
         *
         * Ideally we'd have a real eviction policy, but until we see a problem in practice, I hope
         * that this will suffice. I have not even benchmarked with different size limits.
         */
        if (validClasses.size() > 1000) {
          validClasses.clear();

   * if occurrences == 0. This satisfies both NullPointerTester and
   * CollectionRemoveTester.testRemove_nullAllowed, but it's not clear that it's
   * a good policy, especially because, in order for the test to pass, the
   * parameter must be misleadingly annotated as @Nullable. I suspect that
   * we'll want to remove @Nullable, add an eager checkNotNull, and loosen up

   * The HTTP <a href="https://www.w3.org/TR/permissions-policy-1/">{@code Permissions-Policy}</a>
   * header field name.
   *
   * @since 31.0
   */
  public static final String PERMISSIONS_POLICY = "Permissions-Policy";

  /**
   * The HTTP <a
   * href="https://w3c.github.io/webappsec-permissions-policy/#permissions-policy-report-only-http-header-field">{@code
   * Permissions-Policy-Report-Only}</a> header field name.
   *

  /**
   * Creates a monitor with a non-fair (but fast) ordering policy. Equivalent to {@code
   * Monitor(false)}.
   */
  public Monitor() {
    this(false);
  }

  /**
   * Creates a monitor with the given ordering policy.
   *
   * @param fair whether this monitor should use a fair ordering policy rather than a non-fair (but
   *     fast) one
   */
  public Monitor(boolean fair) {

 *       {@code equals()}, {@code hashCode()}, and graph equivalence</a>
 *   <li><a href="https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/GraphsExplained#synchronization">
 *       Synchronization policy</a>
 *   <li><a href="https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/GraphsExplained#notes-for-implementors">Notes
 *       for implementors</a>
 * </ul>
 *
 * @author James Sexton
 * @author Joshua O'Madadhain