* removeFrom.removeIf(predicate)} instead.
   *
   * @param removeFrom the iterable to (potentially) remove elements from
   * @param predicate a predicate that determines whether an element should be removed
   * @return {@code true} if any elements were removed from the iterable
   * @throws UnsupportedOperationException if the iterable does not support {@code remove()}.
   * @since 2.0
   */

      // it. To preserve FIFO order and failure atomicity of rejected execution when the same
      // Runnable is executed more than once, allocate a wrapper that we know is safe to remove by
      // object identity.
      // A data structure that returned a removal handle from add() would allow eliminating this
      // allocation.
      submittedTask =
          new Runnable() {
            @Override
            public void run() {

  public enum Modifiability {
    NONE, // immutable lists
    BY_ELEMENT, // elements can change (set), but not structure
    DIRECT_ONLY, // Element can be added and removed only via direct calls, not through iterators
    ALL // Elements can be added and removed as well as modified.
  }

  /** Handles the creation of lists needed for the tests */
  public abstract static class ListExample {

    private final String name;

      iterator.next();
      iterator.remove();
      assertEquals(initialSize - 1, map.size());
      // (We can't assert that the values collection no longer contains the
      // removed value, because the underlying map can have multiple mappings
      // to the same value.)
      assertInvariants(map);
      try {
        iterator.remove();
        fail("Expected IllegalStateException.");

   * creation and removal (including automatic removal of zeroes). If the modification of an
   * AtomicInteger results in zero, we compareAndSet the value to zero; if that succeeds, we remove
   * the entry from the Map. If another operation sees a zero in the map, it knows that the entry is
   * about to be removed, so this operation may remove it (often by replacing it with a new
   * AtomicInteger).
   */

      }
    }
  }

  private void compareResultsForThisListOfStimuli() {
    int removes = Collections.frequency(Arrays.asList(stimuli), remove);
    if ((!features.contains(IteratorFeature.SUPPORTS_REMOVE) && removes > 1)
        || (stimuli.length >= 5 && removes > 2)) {
      // removes are the most expensive thing to test, since they often throw exceptions with stack

    }

    @Override
    public boolean remove(@CheckForNull Object element) {
      return contains(element) && unfiltered.remove(element);
    }

    @Override
    public boolean removeAll(final Collection<?> collection) {
      return removeIf(collection::contains);
    }

    @Override
    public boolean retainAll(final Collection<?> collection) {
      return removeIf(element -> !collection.contains(element));
    }

   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>You want to assign the same fraction of inputs to each bucket.
   *   <li>When you reduce the number of buckets, you can accept that the most recently added
   *       buckets will be removed first. More concretely, if you are dividing traffic among tasks,
   *       you can decrease the number of tasks from 15 and 10, killing off the final 5 tasks, and

   * so that we get partial compile-time checking.)
   *
   * <p>This workaround should be removed at a distant future time when we no longer support Java
   * versions earlier than 8.
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("removal") // b/318391980
  private static final class TypeVariableInvocationHandler implements InvocationHandler {

        assertThat(network.removeNode(nodeList.get(i))).isTrue();
      }

      assertThat(network.nodes()).hasSize(NUM_NODES - numNodesToRemove);
      // Number of edges remaining is unknown (node's incident edges have been removed).
      AbstractNetworkTest.validateNetwork(network);

      for (int i = numNodesToRemove; i < NUM_NODES; ++i) {
        assertThat(network.removeNode(nodeList.get(i))).isTrue();
      }