* <p>Rate limiters are often used to restrict the rate at which some physical or logical resource
 * is accessed. This is in contrast to {@link java.util.concurrent.Semaphore} which restricts the
 * number of concurrent accesses instead of the rate (note though that concurrency and rate are
 * closely related, e.g. see <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little%27s_law">Little's
 * Law</a>).
 *

 * the License.
 */

package com.google.common.util.concurrent;

import com.google.common.annotations.J2ktIncompatible;
import java.util.Date;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
import java.util.concurrent.locks.Condition;

/** Forwarding wrapper around a {@code Condition}. */
@J2ktIncompatible
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault

   * out.
   */
  long timeoutMillis() {
    return SHORT_DELAY_MS / 4;
  }

  /** Returns a new Date instance representing a time delayMillis milliseconds in the future. */
  Date delayedDate(long delayMillis) {
    return new Date(System.currentTimeMillis() + delayMillis);
  }

  /** The first exception encountered if any threadAssertXXX method fails. */

   *
   * The Least Recently Used page replacement algorithm was chosen due to its simplicity, high hit
   * rate, and ability to be implemented with O(1) time complexity. The initial LRU implementation
   * operates per-segment rather than globally for increased implementation simplicity. We expect
   * the cache hit rate to be similar to that of a global LRU algorithm.
   */

  // Constants

  /**

an?u&hcuf?stimukuf?z&imi?ou???????ihs&o&gak!.&a&m&ayuok?ihsogak??si?yonak??e&banawak?n&at&akan?imanim??uka??tomoonihsin??i&adnesamustas?k&azarukam?oih??m&ama?uzi??usuy??nesi?o&knik?os?tomustam??uzimurat???rih!.&a&ka&n?s??m&ayukuf?i&hsorihihsagih?j&ate?imakikaso????r&a&bohs?h&ekat?im???es??tiak?wiad??e&kato?ruk??i&h&ci&akustah?mono?nihs??s&inares?oyim???manimasa?uk??negokikesnij?o&gnoh?namuk??uhcuf????uk&ot!.&a&bihci?mi&hsu&kot?stamok??m??wagakan??egihsustam?i&gum?h&coganas?soyim??kijaw?m&anim?uz...

an?u&hcuf?stimukuf?z&imi?ou???????ihs&o&gak!.&a&m&ayuok?ihsogak??si?yonak??e&banawak?n&at&akan?imanim??uka??tomoonihsin??i&adnesamustas?k&azarukam?oih??m&ama?uzi??usuy??nesi?o&knik?os?tomustam??uzimurat???rih!.&a&ka&n?s??m&ayukuf?i&hsorihihsagih?j&ate?imakikaso????r&a&bohs?h&ekat?im???es??tiak?wiad??e&kato?ruk??i&h&ci&akustah?mono?nihs??s&inares?oyim???manimasa?uk??negokikesnij?o&gnoh?namuk??uhcuf????uk&ot!.&a&bihci?mi&hsu&kot?stamok??m??wagakan??egihsustam?i&gum?h&coganas?soyim??kijaw?m&anim?uz...

        @Override
        public String toString() {
          throw new AssertionFailedError();
        }
      };

  private static final String FORMAT = "I ate %s pies.";

  private static void checkMessage(Exception e) {
    assertThat(e).hasMessageThat().isEqualTo("I ate 5 pies.");
  }

   * out.
   */
  long timeoutMillis() {
    return SHORT_DELAY_MS / 4;
  }

  /** Returns a new Date instance representing a time delayMillis milliseconds in the future. */
  Date delayedDate(long delayMillis) {
    return new Date(System.currentTimeMillis() + delayMillis);
  }

  /** The first exception encountered if any threadAssertXXX method fails. */

      return "A message";
    }
  }

  private static final String FORMAT = "I ate %s pies.";

  private static void verifySimpleMessage(Exception e) {
    assertThat(e).hasMessageThat().isEqualTo("A message");
  }

  private static void verifyComplexMessage(Exception e) {
    assertThat(e).hasMessageThat().isEqualTo("I ate 5 pies.");
  }

         * the new one. The result is a ConcurrentModificationException or other bad behavior.
         *
         * (If we decide that we really, really hate allocating two Iterators per cycle instead of
         * one, we can optimistically store the new Iterator and then be willing to throw it out if
         * the user calls remove().)
         */