// since the operation would be a no-op, the exception is not required
    }
    expectUnchanged();
  }

  @MapFeature.Require(value = SUPPORTS_REMOVE, absent = ALLOWS_NULL_VALUE_QUERIES)
  public void testRemove_nullValueQueriesUnsupported() {
    try {
      assertFalse(getMap().remove(k3(), null));
    } catch (NullPointerException tolerated) {
      // since the operation would be a no-op, the exception is not required
    }

 * serialization tests require more setup. This no-op behavior allows test authors to intersperse
 * {@code SerializableTester} calls with other, GWT-compatible tests.
 *
 * @author Mike Bostock
 * @since 10.0
 */
@GwtCompatible // but no-op!
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
public final class SerializableTester {
  private SerializableTester() {}

  /**

  public void testOrdering() {
    final List<Integer> callOrder = Lists.newArrayList();

    class FakeOp implements Runnable {
      final int op;

      FakeOp(int op) {
        this.op = op;
      }

      @Override
      public void run() {
        callOrder.add(op);
      }
    }

    e.execute(new FakeOp(0));
    e.execute(new FakeOp(1));
    e.execute(new FakeOp(2));
    fakePool.runAll();

      // permitted not to throw because it would be a no-op
    }
    expectUnchanged();
  }

  @MapFeature.Require(value = SUPPORTS_PUT, absent = ALLOWS_NULL_KEY_QUERIES)
  public void testReplace_absentNullKeyUnsupported() {
    try {
      getMap().replace(null, v3());
    } catch (NullPointerException tolerated) {
      // permitted not to throw because it would be a no-op
    }
    expectUnchanged();
  }

 *
 * @author Hayward Chan
 */
@GwtCompatible
final class Platform {
  static <T> T[] clone(T[] array) {
    return array.clone();
  }

  // Class.cast is not supported in GWT.  This method is a no-op in GWT.
  static void checkCast(Class<?> clazz, Object obj) {
    Object unused = clazz.cast(obj);
  }

  static String format(String template, Object... args) {
    return String.format(Locale.ROOT, template, args);

/**
 * A generic JUnit test which tests multiset-specific serialization. Can't be invoked directly;
 * please see {@link MultisetTestSuiteBuilder}.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
@GwtCompatible // but no-op
@Ignore // Affects only Android test runner, which respects JUnit 4 annotations on JUnit 3 tests.
@SuppressWarnings("JUnit4ClassUsedInJUnit3")
public class MultisetSerializationTester<E> extends AbstractMultisetTester<E> {

     * Future, then a call setException() would likely also overflow.
     *
     * - If the stack overflowed after set()/setValue() stored its result, then a call to
     * setException() will be a no-op because the Future is already done.
     *
     * Both scenarios are bad: The output Future might never complete, or, if it does complete, it

      ImmutableDoubleArray.Builder builder = ImmutableDoubleArray.builder(RANDOM.nextInt(20));
      AtomicInteger counter = new AtomicInteger(0);
      while (counter.get() < 1000) {
        BuilderOp op = BuilderOp.randomOp();
        op.doIt(builder, counter);
      }
      ImmutableDoubleArray iia = builder.build();
      for (int j = 0; j < iia.length(); j++) {
        assertThat(iia.get(j)).isEqualTo((double) j);
      }
    }

 * implemented in terms of {@link #getIfPresent}; {@link #putAll} is implemented in terms of {@link
 * #put}, {@link #invalidateAll(Iterable)} is implemented in terms of {@link #invalidate}. The
 * method {@link #cleanUp} is a no-op. All other methods throw an {@link
 * UnsupportedOperationException}.
 *
 * @author Charles Fry
 * @since 10.0
 */
@GwtCompatible
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault

anif!.oc,lpl??os??romem?tnedurp??n&if?oitanretni??t&i&gid!.sppaduolc:.nodnol,,?p&ac?soh???ned?ot???c!.&bog?lim?oc?snduolc,topsgolb,vog???dil?e&datic?n&ahc?nahc!rehtaew???t!ria?tam??vart??f&8f&pbgo--nx?tbgm--nx??a?n??g!.&gro?moc?oc?ten?ude?zib,??h&d?op??i!.&21k?ca?fdi?gro?inum?oc!.&egapvar,redrotibat,t&ibatym,opsgolb,???ten?vog??a&f?m&e!.&kwat.p,otkwat.p,psirc.no,??g?toh???m?r??l&a&b&esab?t&eksab!.&sua,zn,??oof???c?mt??e&d?hs??ihmailliw?j??m!.&esserp?gro?moc?ten?ude?v&og?uog????n!.&etisbew321,no&...