ImmutableListMultimap.Builder<String, Integer> builder = new Builder<>();
    final StringHolder holder = new StringHolder();
    holder.string = "one";
    Entry<String, Integer> entry =
        new AbstractMapEntry<String, Integer>() {
          @Override
          public String getKey() {
            return holder.string;
          }

          @Override
          public Integer getValue() {

    ImmutableSetMultimap.Builder<String, Integer> builder = new Builder<>();
    final StringHolder holder = new StringHolder();
    holder.string = "one";
    Entry<String, Integer> entry =
        new AbstractMapEntry<String, Integer>() {
          @Override
          public String getKey() {
            return holder.string;
          }

          @Override
          public Integer getValue() {

    }

    private static final long serialVersionUID = 5;
  }

  public void testMutableValues() {
    IntHolder holderA = new IntHolder(1);
    IntHolder holderB = new IntHolder(2);
    Map<String, IntHolder> map = ImmutableSortedMap.of("a", holderA, "b", holderB);
    holderA.value = 3;
    assertTrue(map.entrySet().contains(Maps.immutableEntry("a", new IntHolder(3))));

    @ParametricNullness
    public T get() {
      // Another variant of Double Checked Locking.
      //
      // We use two volatile reads. We could reduce this to one by
      // putting our fields into a holder class, but (at least on x86)
      // the extra memory consumption and indirection are more
      // expensive than the extra volatile reads.
      long nanos = expirationNanos;
      long now = System.nanoTime();

   * skipping over occurrences of {@link Optional#absent}. Iterators are unmodifiable and are
   * evaluated lazily.
   *
   * <p><b>Comparison to {@code java.util.Optional}:</b> this method has no equivalent in Java 8's
   * {@code Optional} class; use {@code
   * optionals.stream().filter(Optional::isPresent).map(Optional::get)} instead.
   *

    ImmutableSetMultimap.Builder<String, Integer> builder = new Builder<>();
    final StringHolder holder = new StringHolder();
    holder.string = "one";
    Entry<String, Integer> entry =
        new AbstractMapEntry<String, Integer>() {
          @Override
          public String getKey() {
            return holder.string;
          }

          @Override
          public Integer getValue() {

    assertThat(stream(FluentIterable.of(1, 2, 3)).filter(n -> n > 1)).containsExactly(2, 3);
  }

  @SuppressWarnings("deprecation")
  public void testStream_collection() {
    assertThat(stream(Arrays.asList())).isEmpty();
    assertThat(stream(Arrays.asList("a"))).containsExactly("a");
    assertThat(stream(Arrays.asList(1, 2, 3)).filter(n -> n > 1)).containsExactly(2, 3);
  }

   * Generation, described in Knuth's "The Art of Computer Programming", Volume 4, Chapter 7,
   * Section 7.2.1.2. The iteration order follows the lexicographical order. This means that the
   * first permutation will be in ascending order, and the last will be in descending order.
   *
   * <p>Duplicate elements are considered equal. For example, the list [1, 1] will have only one

   * java.util.stream.Stream#filter}. This method is not being deprecated, but we gently encourage
   * you to migrate to streams.
   */
  // TODO(kevinb): how to omit that last sentence when building GWT javadoc?
  public static <E extends @Nullable Object> Set<E> filter(
      Set<E> unfiltered, Predicate<? super E> predicate) {
    if (unfiltered instanceof SortedSet) {
      return filter((SortedSet<E>) unfiltered, predicate);

  private static class HasBoth extends TypeA implements TypeB {}

  @GwtIncompatible // Iterables.filter(Iterable, Class)
  public void testFilterByType_iterator() throws Exception {
    HasBoth hasBoth = new HasBoth();
    Iterable<TypeA> alist = Lists.newArrayList(new TypeA(), new TypeA(), hasBoth, new TypeA());
    Iterable<TypeB> blist = Iterables.filter(alist, TypeB.class);
    assertThat(blist).containsExactly(hasBoth).inOrder();
  }