<prefix>clean</prefix>
      <artifactId>maven-clean-plugin</artifactId>
    </plugin>
    <plugin>
      <name>Maven Integration Test Plugin</name>
      <prefix>deploy</prefix>
      <artifactId>maven-deploy-plugin</artifactId>
    </plugin>
    <plugin>
      <name>Maven Integration Test Plugin</name>
      <prefix>install</prefix>
      <artifactId>maven-install-plugin</artifactId>
    </plugin>

      <fields>
        <field>
          <name>repository</name>
          <version>4.0.0+</version>
          <description>Information needed to deploy the artifacts generated by the project to a
            remote repository.</description>
          <association>
            <type>DeploymentRepository</type>
          </association>
        </field>

      | to be made available to plugin authors. If we find people are getting fancy and want to take advantage of
      | Guice specifics we can expose that later. Really some testing needs to be done to see full hiding
      | of Guice has any impact on what we may categorize as a standard JSR-330 based Tesla/Maven plugin.

        <exportedPackage>com.google.inject.*</exportedPackage>

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<metadata>
  <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
  <artifactId>maven-deploy-plugin</artifactId>
  <version>0.1</version>
  <versioning>
    <latest>0.1</latest>
    <release>0.1</release>
    <versions>
      <version>0.1</version>
    </versions>
    <lastUpdated>20091023224421</lastUpdated>
  </versioning>

            <multiplicity>*</multiplicity>
          </association>
          <comment>
            This may be removed or relocated in the near
            future. It is undecided whether plugins really need a remote
            repository set of their own.
          </comment>
        </field>
        <field xdoc.separator="blank">
          <name>profiles</name>
          <version>1.0.0+</version>

            <multiplicity>*</multiplicity>
          </association>
          <comment><![CDATA[ This may be removed or relocated in the near
            future. It is undecided whether plugins really need a remote
            repository set of their own. ]]></comment>
        </field>
      </fields>
    </class>
    <class>
      <name>Activation</name>
      <version>1.0.0</version>