<!--
      | We may potentially want to export these, but right now I'm not sure that anything Guice specific needs
      | to be made available to plugin authors. If we find people are getting fancy and want to take advantage of
      | Guice specifics we can expose that later. Really some testing needs to be done to see full hiding

  |   what is allowed in the field.
  |
  | o validators: there could be several levels of validation. Simple type validation could
  |   be done with a regex, but we need inter-field validation and rules which could be
  |   dealt with by something like drools.
  |
  | o i18n: would be good to be able to have names/descriptions/specifications

            }

            if ( versioning.getLastUpdated() == null || versioning.getLastUpdated().length() == 0 )
            {
                // this should only be for historical reasons - we assume local is newer
                versioning.setLastUpdated( v.getLastUpdated() );
            }

            if ( v.getLastUpdated() == null || v.getLastUpdated().length() == 0