That documentation will show up in the Swagger UI at `/docs` in your API, and it will let external developers know how to build the *external API*.

This example doesn't implement the callback itself (that could be just a line of code), only the documentation part.

!!! tip
    The actual callback is just an HTTP request.

    * If you didn't use FastAPI and used Starlette directly (or another tool, like Sanic, Flask, Responder, etc) you would have to implement all the data validation and serialization yourself. So, your final application would still have the same overhead as if it was built using FastAPI. And in many cases, this data validation and serialization is the biggest amount of code written in...

 * instance for non-daemon threads.
 *
 * The task runner is also responsible for releasing held threads when the library is unloaded.
 * This is for the benefit of container environments that implement code unloading.
 *
 * Most applications should share a process-wide [TaskRunner] and use queues for per-client work.
 */
class TaskRunner(
  val backend: Backend,
  internal val logger: Logger = TaskRunner.logger,

This can make it a lot easier for your users to **implement their APIs** to receive your **webhook** requests, they might even be able to autogenerate some of their own API code.

!!! info
    Webhooks are available in OpenAPI 3.1.0 and above, supported by FastAPI `0.99.0` and above.

  repeated string audiences = 4;

  // Error indicates that the token couldn't be checked
  // +optional
  optional string error = 3;
}

// UserInfo holds the information about the user needed to implement the
// user.Info interface.
message UserInfo {
  // The name that uniquely identifies this user among all active users.
  // +optional
  optional string username = 1;

This document provides an overview of the architecture and design decisions around Ztunnel, the node-proxy component in ambient mode.

## Background and motivation

Motivations to implement ztunnel generally came from two areas.

First, and most importantly, it serves as a means to implement the real goal: waypoints.
For various reasons outside the scope of this document, there is a desire to move from a sidecar based architecture to a "remote proxy" architecture.

 could encapsulate everything we need about the project in the POM including
 plugin parameters and anything else.

 We once had a document that Vincent and I agreed upon and I was about to
 implement it and then I disappeared for 8 months so it never came to pass.

 So I guess it's important to figure out what people are using properties
 files for and see if we can't incorporate it all into the POM. Or if we do

  repeated string audiences = 4;

  // Error indicates that the token couldn't be checked
  // +optional
  optional string error = 3;
}

// UserInfo holds the information about the user needed to implement the
// user.Info interface.
message UserInfo {
  // The name that uniquely identifies this user among all active users.
  // +optional
  optional string username = 1;

  // Non-standard protocols should use prefixed names such as
  // mycompany.com/my-custom-protocol.
  // +optional
  optional string appProtocol = 4;
}

// EndpointSlice represents a subset of the endpoints that implement a service.
// For a given service there may be multiple EndpointSlice objects, selected by
// labels, which must be joined to produce the full set of endpoints.
message EndpointSlice {
  // Standard object's metadata.

 *
 * This class contains a Kotlin implementation of the pseudocode specified by RFC 3492. It includes
 * direct translation of the pseudocode presented there.
 *
 * Partner this class with [UTS #46] to implement IDNA2008 [RFC 5890] like most browsers do.
 *
 * [RFC 3492]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc3492
 * [RFC 5890]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5890
 * [UTS #46]: https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr46/
 */