require a JIRA issue. Your pull request should address just this issue, without
       pulling in other changes.
 - [ ] Each commit in the pull request should have a meaningful subject line and body.
 - [ ] Format the pull request title like `[MNG-XXX] SUMMARY`,
       where you replace `MNG-XXX` and `SUMMARY` with the appropriate JIRA issue.

  maven occur, the maven inheritance model must be pinned against a particular
  modelVersion. This is required so that a change from modelVersion 4.0.0 to
  4.1.0 doesn't cause compatibility problems with users who have not upgraded
  their projects. It also allows for a certain amount of legacy support into the
  future. Therefore, we should rename this file from pom.xml in the maven-core

and such source code may be obtained at <a href="http://www.eclipse.org/">http://www.eclipse.org</a>.</p>

<h3>Third Party Content</h3>
<p>The Content includes items that have been sourced from third parties as set
out below. If you did not receive this Content directly from the Eclipse Foundation,
the following is provided for informational purposes only, and you should look

  operations to fail, then trying to help users decipher the error messages they
  get as a result.

* Implications for Resolution

** Dependency Resolution

  This one is obvious...we only have access to the repositories using
  the file:// protocol and living on a truly local filesystem when
  offline.

** Plugin Resolution

  This is similar to dependency resolution. Plugin repositories not

the concept of a project object model (POM), Maven can manage a project's
build, reporting and documentation from a central piece of information.

If you think you have found a bug, please file an issue in the [Maven Issue Tracker][jira].

Documentation
-------------

More information can be found on [Apache Maven Homepage][maven-home].

 that currently we have information about a project scattered across the project.xml and the
 various properties files. What needs to be done is to encapsulate all of this in the POM.

 Typically users parameterize the use of plugins, or have custom values like ${user.name}
 for use in elements like the <developerConnection/>. It would be idea if we

We have a lifecycle mapping for the packaging of *jar* below. You see that for this packaging we have a *default* lifecycle and a list of phases where each phase is a comma separated list of goals to run and they are in the form groupId:artifactId:version.

<configuration>
  <lifecycles>
    <lifecycle>
      <id>default</id>
      <phases>
        <process-resources>org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-resources-plugin:resources</process-resources>

  <distributionManagement>
    <site>
      <id>apache.website</id>
      <url>scp://people.apache.org/www/maven.apache.org</url>
    </site>
  </distributionManagement>

<!-- Disabled until projects have been made to comply
  <build>
    <plugins>
      <plugin>
        <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
        <artifactId>maven-pmd-plugin</artifactId>
        <executions>
          <execution>

* Maven test harness for plugin execution model
* Eclipse IDE tooling for plugin execution model and metadata model

- we also seem to have information like the plugin lifecycle model that's buried inside the maven execution model
- we also seem to have artifact information tangled inside the plugin model
- we have to deal with scripting implementations (groovy, beanshell, ruby)
- we need to deal with a shared context for plugins, like the guarded mojos