where you replace `MNG-XXX` and `SUMMARY` with the appropriate JIRA issue.
 - [ ] Also format the first line of the commit message like `[MNG-XXX] SUMMARY`.
       Best practice is to use the JIRA issue title in both the pull request title and in the first line of the commit message.
 - [ ] Write a pull request description that is detailed enough to understand what the pull request does, how, and why.

distribute the Program at all. For example, if a patent license would
not permit royalty-free redistribution of the Program by all those who
receive copies directly or indirectly through you, then the only way you
could satisfy both it and this License would be to refrain entirely from
distribution of the Program.

If any portion of this section is held invalid or unenforceable under
any particular circumstance, the balance of the section is intended to

  at the same time avoiding introducing required plexus dependencies into the
  mojo development model.

  In order to really achieve this, we need mojo configurations (which are
  provided both in terms of static expressions that are just looked up, and
  in terms of user-provided configuration from properties or the POM).
  If these mojos are to be first-class components, the configuration from these

                <includes>
                    <include>LICENSE-junit.txt</include>
                </includes>
            </resource>
        </resources>
        <plugins>
            <!--
            Both "org.apache" and "org.codehaus" are default providers of MOJO plugins
            which are especially dedicated to Maven projects.
            The MOJO stands for "Maven plain Old Java Object".

 * directory to a method in the application interface?
 *
 * - research extension points versus plugins
 *
 * from igor: two plugins A and B, both depend on the same library but use different versions, say
 * lib 1.0 and lib 2.0 when debugger hits a breakpoint inside a class from the library, IDE needs to
 * know which version of library the class comes from
 */