- master
  pull_request:
    branches:
      - master

permissions:
  contents: read

jobs:
  test:
    permissions:
      actions: write  # for styfle/cancel-workflow-action to cancel/stop running workflows
      contents: read  # for actions/checkout to fetch code
    name: "${{ matrix.root-pom }} on JDK ${{ matrix.java }} on ${{ matrix.os }}"
    strategy:
      matrix:
        os: [ ubuntu-latest ]

  - type: markdown
    attributes:
      value: >
        Did you *actually* encounter the need for this enhancement in a real-world scenario, or does
        it just seem like a sensible behavior for the feature to have?


        Before we make significant changes to existing features in Guava, we really want to be sure
        that it's for a use case that actually comes up in the real world. We want to hear the

name: Bug Report
description: Something is not working as expected
labels: ["type=defect"]
body:
  - type: markdown
    attributes:
      value: >
        Thank you for filing a bug report. Please help us identify and resolve the bug by filling
        out the following fields.

  - type: textarea
    attributes:
      label: Description
      description: Please describe the issue you encountered.
    validations:
      required: true

        method signatures would look like, for example, even if the method and class names are still
        in flux. This can make the feature you're suggesting much clearer to us.

  - type: textarea
    attributes:
      label: (Optional) What would the method signatures for your feature look like?
      placeholder: |
        e.g.,
        public static <E> ImmutableList<E> of();

          # Public repositories:
          #   - Publish results to OpenSSF REST API for easy access by consumers
          #   - Allows the repository to include the Scorecard badge.
          #   - See https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action#publishing-results.
          # For private repositories:
          #   - `publish_results` will always be set to `false`, regardless