}

    @Override
    public ListenableScheduledFuture<?> schedule(Runnable command, long delay, TimeUnit unit) {
      TrustedListenableFutureTask<@Nullable Void> task =
          TrustedListenableFutureTask.create(command, null);
      ScheduledFuture<?> scheduled = delegate.schedule(task, delay, unit);
      return new ListenableScheduledTask<@Nullable Void>(task, scheduled);
    }

    @Override

         * unique within a single POM. Upon multiple declarations, 2.x just kept the last one but retained the order of
         * the first occurrence. So when we're in lenient/compat mode, we have to deal with such broken POMs and mimic
         * the way 2.x works. When we're in strict mode, the removal of duplicates just saves other merging steps from
         * aftereffects and bogus error messages.
         */

    List<T> list = Arrays.asList(strictlyOrderedElements);

    // for use calling Collection.toArray later
    T[] emptyArray = Platform.newArray(strictlyOrderedElements, 0);

    // shoot me, but I didn't want to deal with wildcards through the whole test
    @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
    Scenario<T> starter = new Scenario<>((Ordering<T>) ordering, list, emptyArray);
    verifyScenario(starter, 0);
  }

    List<T> list = Arrays.asList(strictlyOrderedElements);

    // for use calling Collection.toArray later
    T[] emptyArray = Platform.newArray(strictlyOrderedElements, 0);

    // shoot me, but I didn't want to deal with wildcards through the whole test
    @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
    Scenario<T> starter = new Scenario<>((Ordering<T>) ordering, list, emptyArray);
    verifyScenario(starter, 0);
  }

      // It's a weird formula, but tests prove it works.
      int adjust = size() - 1;
      for (int i = 0; i < axes.size(); i++) {
        adjust *= 31;
        adjust = ~~adjust;
        // in GWT, we have to deal with integer overflow carefully
      }
      int hash = 1;
      for (Set<E> axis : axes) {
        hash = 31 * hash + (size() / axis.size() * axis.hashCode());

        hash = ~~hash;
      }

        // We have metadata retrieval problems, or there are cycles that have been detected
        // so we give this back to the calling code and let them deal with this information
        // appropriately.

        if (result.hasMetadataResolutionExceptions()
                || result.hasVersionRangeViolations()
                || result.hasCircularDependencyExceptions()) {

  public int hashCode() {
    int hashCode = 1;
    int n = size();
    for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
      hashCode = 31 * hashCode + get(i).hashCode();

      hashCode = ~~hashCode;
      // needed to deal with GWT integer overflow
    }
    return hashCode;
  }

  /*
   * Serializes ImmutableLists as their logical contents. This ensures that

   *
   * if (guardExpression) {
   *    throw new BadException(badMsg(...));
   * }
   *
   * The alternative natural refactorings into void or Exception-returning methods are much slower.
   * This is a big deal - we're talking factors of 2-8 in microbenchmarks, not just 10-20%. (This is
   * a hotspot optimizer bug, which should be fixed, but that's a separate, big project).
   *

      throw new InterruptedException();
    }
    Object localValue = value;
    if (localValue != null & !(localValue instanceof SetFuture)) {
      return getDoneValue(localValue);
    }
    // we delay calling nanoTime until we know we will need to either park or spin
    final long endNanos = remainingNanos > 0 ? System.nanoTime() + remainingNanos : 0;
    long_wait_loop:
    if (remainingNanos >= SPIN_THRESHOLD_NANOS) {

                                    e.getModelId(), e.getMessage(), pomFile != null ? pomFile.toFile() : null, e);
                        }
                        // validation error, continue project building and delay failing to help IDEs
                        error = e;
                    }

                    modelProblems = result.getProblems();

                    initProject(project, Collections.emptyMap(), result);