* execute Queue#drainTo is not added *on top* of waiting for the timeout (which could make
     * the timeout arbitrarily inaccurate, given a queue that is slow to drain).
     */
    long deadline = System.nanoTime() + unit.toNanos(timeout);
    int added = 0;
    while (added < numElements) {
      // we could rely solely on #poll, but #drainTo might be more efficient when there are multiple

  // * We want to behave reasonably for timeouts of 0
  // * We are more responsive to completion than timeouts. This is because parkNanos depends on
  //   system scheduling and as such we could either miss our deadline, or unpark() could be delayed
  //   so that it looks like we timed out even though we didn't. For comparison FutureTask respects
  //   completion preferably and AQS is non-deterministic (depends on where in the queue the waiter

        new Thread(() -> {
            try {
                BufferedReader reader = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(forkedProcessOutput));
                String line;
                while ((line = reader.readLine()) != null) {
                    ps.println(line);
                }
            } catch (Exception e) {
                e.printStackTrace();
            } finally {
                latch.countDown();

     * @return 一行の文字列。終端に達した場合は{@literal null}
     * @see BufferedReader#readLine()
     */
    public static String readLine(final BufferedReader reader) {
        assertArgumentNotNull("reader", reader);

        try {
            return reader.readLine();
        } catch (final IOException e) {
            throw new IORuntimeException(e);
        }
    }

    /**

        assertArgumentNotNull("reader", reader);
        this.reader = reader;
    }

    @Override
    public boolean hasNext() {
        if (line == EMPTY) {
            line = ReaderUtil.readLine(reader);
        }
        return line != null;
    }

    @Override
    public String next() {
        if (!hasNext()) {
            throw new NoSuchElementException();
        }