* }
 * }</pre>
 *
 * ... produces output such as:
 *
 * <pre>{@code
 * Zachary: [Taylor]
 * John: [Adams, Adams, Tyler, Kennedy]  // Remember, Quincy!
 * George: [Washington, Bush, Bush]
 * Grover: [Cleveland, Cleveland]        // Two, non-consecutive terms, rep'ing NJ!
 * ...
 * }</pre>
 *
 * <h3>Views</h3>
 *
 * <p>Much of the power of the multimap API comes from the <i>view collections</i> it provides.

/** Unit test for {@link Streams}. */
@GwtCompatible(emulated = true)
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
public class StreamsTest extends TestCase {
  /*
   * Full and proper black-box testing of a Stream-returning method is extremely involved, and is
   * overkill when nearly all Streams are produced using well-tested JDK calls. So, we cheat and
   * just test that the toArray() contents are as expected.

  protected void expectMissingValues(V... elements) {
    for (V element : elements) {
      assertFalse("Should not contain value " + element, getMap().containsValue(element));
    }
  }

  /** @return an array of the proper size with {@code null} as the key of the middle element. */
  protected Entry<K, V>[] createArrayWithNullKey() {
    Entry<K, V>[] array = createSamplesArray();
    int nullKeyLocation = getNullLocation();

        /*
         * NOTE: "invoker:install" vs "appassembler:assemble": Both mojos use the artifact installer to put an artifact
         * into a repository. In the first case, the result needs to be a proper local repository that one can use for
         * local artifact resolution. In the second case, the result needs to precisely obey the path information of the

    throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
  }

  /**
   * Not supported. <b>You are attempting to create a set that may contain a non-{@code Comparable}
   * element.</b> Proper calls will resolve to the version in {@code ImmutableSortedSet}, not this
   * dummy version.
   *
   * @throws UnsupportedOperationException always

 *   <li>remove();
 *   <li>next();
 * </ol>
 *
 * <p>This particular order of operations may be unrealistic, and testing all 3^5 of them may be
 * thought of as overkill; however, it's difficult to determine which proper subset of this massive
 * set would be sufficient to expose any possible bug. Brute force is simpler.
 *
 * <p>To use this class the concrete subclass must implement the {@link

import java.util.concurrent.ScheduledExecutorService;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException;
import junit.framework.TestCase;

/**
 * Tests for {@link FluentFuture}. The tests cover only the basics for the API. The actual logic is
 * tested in {@link FuturesTest}.
 */
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
@GwtCompatible(emulated = true)
public class FluentFutureTest extends TestCase {

    private ArrayWithDuplicate(E[] elements, E duplicate) {
      this.elements = elements;
      this.duplicate = duplicate;
    }
  }

  /**
   * @return an array of the proper size with a duplicate element. The size must be at least three.
   */
  protected ArrayWithDuplicate<E> createArrayWithDuplicateElement() {
    E[] elements = createSamplesArray();

    assertSame(a, numberOrdering.max(ints));
    assertSame(a, numberOrdering.min(ints));
  }

  public void testVarargsMinAndMax() {
    // try the min and max values in all positions, since some values are proper
    // parameters and others are from the varargs array
    assertEquals(9, (int) numberOrdering.max(9, 3, 0, 5, 8));
    assertEquals(9, (int) numberOrdering.max(5, 9, 0, 3, 8));

    assertSame(a, numberOrdering.max(ints));
    assertSame(a, numberOrdering.min(ints));
  }

  public void testVarargsMinAndMax() {
    // try the min and max values in all positions, since some values are proper
    // parameters and others are from the varargs array
    assertEquals(9, (int) numberOrdering.max(9, 3, 0, 5, 8));
    assertEquals(9, (int) numberOrdering.max(5, 9, 0, 3, 8));