}

    void sleepMicros(String caption, long micros) {
      instant += MICROSECONDS.toNanos(micros);
      events.add(caption + String.format(Locale.ROOT, "%3.2f", (micros / 1000000.0)));
    }

    @Override
    protected void sleepMicrosUninterruptibly(long micros) {
      sleepMicros("R", micros);
    }

    String readEventsAndClear() {
      try {

          return stopwatch.elapsed(MICROSECONDS);
        }

        @Override
        protected void sleepMicrosUninterruptibly(long micros) {
          if (micros > 0) {
            Uninterruptibles.sleepUninterruptibly(micros, MICROSECONDS);
          }
        }
      };
    }
  }

  private static void checkPermits(int permits) {

    assertEquals(34, stopwatch.elapsed(NANOSECONDS));

    stopwatch.stop();
    ticker.advance(36);
    assertEquals(34, stopwatch.elapsed(NANOSECONDS));
  }

  public void testElapsed_micros() {
    stopwatch.start();
    ticker.advance(999);
    assertEquals(0, stopwatch.elapsed(MICROSECONDS));
    ticker.advance(1);
    assertEquals(1, stopwatch.elapsed(MICROSECONDS));
  }

/**
 * Computes a value, possibly asynchronously. For an example usage and more information, see {@link
 * Futures.FutureCombiner#callAsync(AsyncCallable, java.util.concurrent.Executor)}.
 *
 * <p>Much like {@link java.util.concurrent.Callable}, but returning a {@link ListenableFuture}
 * result.
 *
 * @since 20.0
 */
@GwtCompatible
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault

   * invokeAny} which are pending serial execution, even the subset of the tasks that have not yet
   * started execution. It is unclear from the {@code ExecutorService} specification if these should
   * be included, and it's much easier to implement the interpretation that they not be. Finally, a
   * call to {@code shutdown} or {@code shutdownNow} may result in concurrent calls to {@code

import java.util.Map;
import java.util.Map.Entry;
import org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual.Nullable;
import org.junit.Ignore;

/**
 * Base class for map testers.
 *
 * <p>TODO: see how much of this is actually needed once Map testers are written. (It was cloned
 * from AbstractCollectionTester.)
 *
 * @param <K> the key type of the map to be tested.
 * @param <V> the value type of the map to be tested.

   * ImmutableList.copyOf} and use that list instead.
   */
  public List<Integer> asList() {
    /*
     * Typically we cache this kind of thing, but much repeated use of this view is a performance
     * anti-pattern anyway. If we cache, then everyone pays a price in memory footprint even if
     * they never use this method.
     */
    return new AsList(this);
  }

 * George: [Washington, Bush, Bush]
 * Grover: [Cleveland, Cleveland]        // Two, non-consecutive terms, rep'ing NJ!
 * ...
 * }</pre>
 *
 * <h3>Views</h3>
 *
 * <p>Much of the power of the multimap API comes from the <i>view collections</i> it provides.
 * These always reflect the latest state of the multimap itself. When they support modification, the

   * ImmutableList.copyOf} and use that list instead.
   */
  public List<Double> asList() {
    /*
     * Typically we cache this kind of thing, but much repeated use of this view is a performance
     * anti-pattern anyway. If we cache, then everyone pays a price in memory footprint even if
     * they never use this method.
     */
    return new AsList(this);
  }

      fail();
    } catch (IndexOutOfBoundsException expected) {
    }
  }

  /*
   * Whenever an implementation uses `instanceof` on a parameter instance, the test has to know that
   * (so much for "black box") and try instances that both do and don't pass the check. The "don't"
   * half of that is more awkward to arrange...
   */
  private static <T> Iterable<T> iterable(final Collection<T> collection) {