// Copyright 2011 Google Inc. All Rights Reserved.

package com.google.common.hash;

import static com.google.common.base.Charsets.ISO_8859_1;
import static com.google.common.base.Charsets.UTF_8;
import static com.google.common.truth.Truth.assertThat;

import com.google.common.base.Strings;
import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableSortedMap;
import com.google.common.collect.Ordering;
import com.google.common.primitives.UnsignedLong;

// Copyright 2011 Google Inc. All Rights Reserved.

package com.google.common.hash;

import static com.google.common.base.Preconditions.checkPositionIndexes;
import static com.google.common.hash.LittleEndianByteArray.load64;
import static com.google.common.hash.LittleEndianByteArray.load64Safely;
import static java.lang.Long.rotateRight;

import com.google.common.annotations.VisibleForTesting;

/**

// Copyright 2011 Google Inc. All Rights Reserved.

package com.google.common.hash;

import static com.google.common.base.Charsets.ISO_8859_1;
import static com.google.common.base.Charsets.UTF_8;
import static com.google.common.truth.Truth.assertThat;

import com.google.common.base.Strings;
import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableSortedMap;
import com.google.common.collect.Ordering;
import com.google.common.primitives.UnsignedLong;

 * annotated with LargeTest.
 *
 * <p>Why use a custom annotation instead of {@code android.test.suitebuilder.annotation.Suppress}?
 * I'm not completely sure that this is the right choice, but it has various advantages:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>An annotation named just "Suppress" might someday be treated by a non-Android tool as a
 *       suppression. This would follow the precedent of many of our annotation processors, which

          return classify(Ints.compare(left, right));
        }

        @Override
        public ComparisonChain compare(long left, long right) {
          return classify(Longs.compare(left, right));
        }

        @Override
        public ComparisonChain compare(float left, float right) {
          return classify(Float.compare(left, right));
        }

        @Override

      successor(pred(), succ());
      if (left == null) {
        return right;
      } else if (right == null) {
        return left;
      } else if (left.height >= right.height) {
        AvlNode<E> newTop = pred();
        // newTop is the maximum node in my left subtree
        newTop.left = left.removeMax(newTop);
        newTop.right = right;
        newTop.distinctElements = distinctElements - 1;

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtCompatible;

/**
 * Calculates the weights of cache entries.
 *
 * @author Charles Fry
 * @since 11.0
 */
@GwtCompatible
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
public interface Weigher<K, V> {

  /**
   * Returns the weight of a cache entry. There is no unit for entry weights; rather they are simply
   * relative to each other.
   *

     * known-non-null type? But that particular problem might not arise here, since we're not
     * actually reading from the fields in any case in which they might be null (as proven by the
     * requireNonNull checks below). Plus, we're *already* lying here, since newHeader passes a null
     * key and value, which we pass to the superconstructor, even though the key and value type for

@SuppressWarnings({"unchecked", "rawtypes"}) // TODO(kevinb): the right way to explain this??
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
final class ReverseNaturalOrdering extends Ordering<Comparable<?>> implements Serializable {
  static final ReverseNaturalOrdering INSTANCE = new ReverseNaturalOrdering();

  @Override
  public int compare(Comparable<?> left, Comparable<?> right) {
    checkNotNull(left); // right null is caught later
    if (left == right) {

  private static class BinaryNode {
    final int x;
    final Optional<BinaryNode> left;
    final Optional<BinaryNode> right;

    BinaryNode(int x, Optional<BinaryNode> left, Optional<BinaryNode> right) {
      this.x = x;
      this.left = left;
      this.right = right;
    }
  }

  enum Topology {
    BALANCED {
      @Override
      Optional<BinaryNode> createTree(int size, Random rng) {