// flip GOLDEN_PRESENT_KEY to true even if it wasn't explicitly inserted
    // (false positive).
    assertThat(bloomFilter.mightContain(GOLDEN_PRESENT_KEY)).isFalse();
    for (int i = 0; i < NUM_PUTS; i++) {
      bloomFilter.put(getNonGoldenRandomKey());
    }
    bloomFilter.put(GOLDEN_PRESENT_KEY);

    int numThreads = 12;

   * currently skipping MediumTests on Android, and we skip them by not making them present at
   * runtime at all. I could just make _this_ test a MediumTest, but then it wouldn't run on
   * Android.... The right long-term fix is probably to get MediumTests running under Android by
   * default and then suppress them strategically as needed.
   */

   * currently skipping MediumTests on Android, and we skip them by not making them present at
   * runtime at all. I could just make _this_ test a MediumTest, but then it wouldn't run on
   * Android.... The right long-term fix is probably to get MediumTests running under Android by
   * default and then suppress them strategically as needed.
   */

    try {
      ImmutableDoubleArray.builder(-1);
      fail();
    } catch (IllegalArgumentException expected) {
    }
  }

  /**
   * If there's a bug in builder growth, we wouldn't know how to expose it. So, brute force the hell
   * out of it for a while and see what happens.
   */
  public void testBuilder_bruteForce() {
    for (int i = 0; i < reduceIterationsIfGwt(100); i++) {

    try {
      ImmutableLongArray.builder(-1);
      fail();
    } catch (IllegalArgumentException expected) {
    }
  }

  /**
   * If there's a bug in builder growth, we wouldn't know how to expose it. So, brute force the hell
   * out of it for a while and see what happens.
   */
  public void testBuilder_bruteForce() {
    for (int i = 0; i < reduceIterationsIfGwt(100); i++) {

         * an unchecked cast. We know, however, that the only possible value for
         * the type parameter is <E>, since otherwise the
         * MultiExceptionListIterator wouldn't be an Iterator<E>. The cast is
         * safe, even though javac can't tell.
         *
         * Sun bug 6665356 is an additional complication. Until OpenJDK 7, javac

         * don't _want_ our new TypeVariable to be equal to the JDK TypeVariable because it has
         * _different bounds_ than the JDK TypeVariable. And it wouldn't make sense for our new
         * TypeVariable to be equal to any _other_ JDK TypeVariable, either, because any other JDK
         * TypeVariable must have a different declaration or name. The only TypeVariable that our

    /*
     * Safe because all we do is remove values for the key, not add them. (If we wanted to make sure
     * to call getCopy and removeAllNodes only with a true K, then we could check containsKey first.
     * But that check wouldn't eliminate the warnings.)
     */
    @SuppressWarnings({"unchecked", "nullness"})
    K castKey = (K) key;
    List<V> oldValues = getCopy(castKey);
    removeAllNodes(castKey);
    return oldValues;
  }

import java.util.List;
import junit.framework.TestSuite;

/**
 * Unit test for {@link Resources}.
 *
 * @author Chris Nokleberg
 */

public class ResourcesTest extends IoTestCase {

  @AndroidIncompatible // wouldn't run anyway, but strip the source entirely because of b/230620681
  public static TestSuite suite() {
    TestSuite suite = new TestSuite();
    suite.addTest(
        ByteSourceTester.tests(

      super(message);
    }

    @Override
    public synchronized Throwable fillInStackTrace() {
      setStackTrace(new StackTraceElement[0]);
      return this; // no stack trace, wouldn't be useful anyway
    }
  }

  @Override
  @CheckForNull
  protected String pendingToString() {
    ListenableFuture<? extends V> localInputFuture = delegateRef;
    ScheduledFuture<?> localTimer = timer;