* function doing a good job of distributing the elements to the buckets to a distribution not far
 * from uniform), and amortized since some operations can trigger a hash table resize.
 *
 * <p>As compared with {@link java.util.LinkedHashMap}, this structure places significantly reduced
 * load on the garbage collector by only using a constant number of internal objects.
 *

    return new SingletonImmutableSet<>(e1);
  }

  /*
   * TODO: b/315526394 - Skip the Builder entirely for the of(...) methods, since we don't need to
   * worry that we might trigger the fallback to the JDK-backed implementation? (The varargs one
   * _could_, so we could keep it as it is. Or we could convince ourselves that hash flooding is
   * unlikely in practice there, too.)
   */

  /**

   *       to do something different. In other cases, no code will catch the exception, and it may
   *       terminate whichever thread happens to trigger the execution.
   * </ul>
   *
   * A specific warning about locking: Code that executes user-supplied tasks, such as {@code
   * ListenableFuture} listeners, should take care not to do so while holding a lock. Additionally,

 * function doing a good job of distributing the elements to the buckets to a distribution not far
 * from uniform), and amortized since some operations can trigger a hash table resize.
 *
 * <p>As compared with {@link java.util.LinkedHashMap}, this structure places significantly reduced
 * load on the garbage collector by only using a constant number of internal objects.
 *

   * Future}.
   *
   * <p>Note that, even if the supplied future is cancelled and it causes this future to complete,
   * it will never trigger interruption behavior. In particular, it will not cause this future to
   * invoke the {@link #interruptTask} method, and the {@link #wasInterrupted} method will not
   * return {@code true}.
   *

   * Future}.
   *
   * <p>Note that, even if the supplied future is cancelled and it causes this future to complete,
   * it will never trigger interruption behavior. In particular, it will not cause this future to
   * invoke the {@link #interruptTask} method, and the {@link #wasInterrupted} method will not
   * return {@code true}.
   *

 * good job of distributing the elements to the buckets to a distribution not far from uniform), and
 * amortized since some operations can trigger a hash table resize.
 *
 * <p>Unlike {@code java.util.HashSet}, iteration is only proportional to the actual {@code size()},
 * which is optimal, and <i>not</i> the size of the internal hashtable, which could be much larger

             * performed in the order they were provided to the constructor. Verify
             * that as a sanity check:
             */
            assertFalse(future2.isCancelled());
            // Now attempt to trigger the exception:
            future2.set(DATA2);
          }
        },
        directExecutor());
    assertTrue(compound.cancel(false));
    assertTrue(compound.isCancelled());

             * performed in the order they were provided to the constructor. Verify
             * that as a sanity check:
             */
            assertFalse(future2.isCancelled());
            // Now attempt to trigger the exception:
            future2.set(DATA2);
          }
        },
        directExecutor());
    assertTrue(compound.cancel(false));
    assertTrue(compound.isCancelled());

    setDelays();
  }

  /**
   * Extra checks that get done for all test cases.
   *
   * <p>Triggers test case failure if any thread assertions have failed, by rethrowing, in the test
   * harness thread, any exception recorded earlier by threadRecordFailure.
   *
   * <p>Triggers test case failure if interrupt status is set in the main thread.
   */
  @Override
  public void tearDown() throws Exception {