* Returns the minimum of the two values. If the values compare as 0, the first is returned.
   *
   * <p>The recommended solution for finding the {@code minimum} of some values depends on the type
   * of your data and the number of elements you have. Read more in the Guava User Guide article on
   * <a href="https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/CollectionUtilitiesExplained#comparators">{@code
   * Comparators}</a>.
   *

      } else {
        return contains(element) ? unfiltered.remove(element, occurrences) : 0;
      }
    }
  }

  /**
   * Returns the expected number of distinct elements given the specified elements. The number of
   * distinct elements is only computed if {@code elements} is an instance of {@code Multiset};
   * otherwise the default value of 11 is returned.
   */

   * sets ("constant sets"), with a given comparator. Example:
   *
   * <pre>{@code
   * public static final ImmutableSortedSet<Number> LUCKY_NUMBERS =
   *     new ImmutableSortedSet.Builder<Number>(ODDS_FIRST_COMPARATOR)
   *         .addAll(SINGLE_DIGIT_PRIMES)
   *         .add(42)
   *         .build();
   * }</pre>
   *

    return (valueComparator == null)
        ? new ImmutableSet.Builder<V>()
        : new ImmutableSortedSet.Builder<V>(valueComparator);
  }

  /**
   * @serialData number of distinct keys, and then for each distinct key: the key, the number of
   *     values for that key, and the key's values
   */
  @GwtIncompatible // java.io.ObjectOutputStream
  @J2ktIncompatible

   * comparator has a more general type than the map's keys, such as creating a {@code
   * SortedMap<Integer, String>} with a {@code Comparator<Number>}, use the {@link Builder}
   * constructor instead.
   *
   * @throws NullPointerException if {@code comparator} is null
   */
  public static <K, V> Builder<K, V> orderedBy(Comparator<K> comparator) {

   */
  public static <K, V> Builder<K, V> builder() {
    return new Builder<>();
  }

  /**
   * Returns a new builder, expecting the specified number of entries to be added.
   *
   * <p>If {@code expectedSize} is exactly the number of entries added to the builder before {@link
   * Builder#build} is called, the builder is likely to perform better than an unsized {@link
   * #builder()} would have.
   *

   * is what most users want and expect it to do.
   *
   * <p>This behavior can't be broadly guaranteed, but has been tested with OpenJDK 1.7 and 1.8.
   *
   * @param expectedSize the number of elements you expect to add to the returned set
   * @return a new, empty hash set with enough capacity to hold {@code expectedSize} elements
   *     without resizing

   */
  public static <K, V> Builder<K, V> builder() {
    return new Builder<>();
  }

  /**
   * Returns a new builder, expecting the specified number of entries to be added.
   *
   * <p>If {@code expectedSize} is exactly the number of entries added to the builder before {@link
   * Builder#build} is called, the builder is likely to perform better than an unsized {@link
   * #builder()} would have.
   *

   */
  public static <E> Builder<E> builder() {
    return new Builder<>();
  }

  /**
   * Returns a new builder, expecting the specified number of distinct elements to be added.
   *
   * <p>If {@code expectedSize} is exactly the number of distinct elements added to the builder
   * before {@link Builder#build} is called, the builder is likely to perform better than an unsized
   * {@link #builder()} would have.

   */
  public static <E> Builder<E> builder() {
    return new Builder<>();
  }

  /**
   * Returns a new builder, expecting the specified number of elements to be added.
   *
   * <p>If {@code expectedSize} is exactly the number of elements added to the builder before {@link
   * Builder#build} is called, the builder is likely to perform better than an unsized {@link
   * #builder()} would have.
   *